期刊文献+

超声引导下双侧弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞在子宫内膜癌全子宫切除术中的麻醉效果分析

Analysis of Anesthesia Effect of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block at the Lateral Supra-arcuate Ligament in Total Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨超声引导下双侧弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞(QLB-LSAL)在子宫内膜癌患者全子宫切除术中的麻醉效果。方法 前瞻性纳入98例拟行腹腔镜全子宫切除术治疗的子宫内膜癌患者为研究对象,根据随机信封法随机分为观察组和对照组,各49例。对照组患者在超声引导下行腹横肌平面阻滞麻醉(TAPB),观察组患者在超声引导下行双侧QLB-LSAL。比较两组术后6 h、24 h疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]及镇静程度(Ramsay评分),记录患者入室时(T_(0))、气管插管(T_(1))、手术结束时(T_(2))的心率和平均动脉压;术后恢复情况及麻醉不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组术后6 h VAS评分及Ramsay评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后48 h自控镇痛按压次数、舒芬太尼用量少于对照组,术后苏醒时间、首次下床活动时间短于对照组(P<0.05);两组T_(0)时心率、平均动脉压比较无差异(P>0.05);两组T_(1)、T_(2)时心率、平均动脉压均较T_(0)时升高,但观察组T_(1)、T_(2)时心率、平均动脉压均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后不良反应发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 超声引导下双侧QLB-LSAL在子宫内膜癌患者全子宫切除术中应用,能发挥理想的镇痛、镇静效果,保持患者血流动力学稳定,可减少麻醉药物用量及麻醉不良反应。 Objective To explore the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament(QLB-LSAL)in total hysterectomy for endometrial cancer patients.Methods A prospective study was conducted on 98 patients with endometrial cancer who planned to undergo laparoscopic total hysterectomy.They were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group using the random envelope method,with 49 patients in each group.The control group underwent transabdominal transverse muscle plane block anesthesia(TAPB)under ultrasound guidance,while the observation group underwent bilateral QLB-LSAL under ultrasound guidance.The pain level(VAS)and sedation level(Ramsay score)were compared between the 2 groups at 6 and 24 hours after surgery,and the heart rate and mean arterial pressure of patients at entry(T 0),tracheal intubation(T 1),and end of surgery(T 2),postoperative recovery and occurrence of adverse anesthesia reactions were recorded.Results The VAS score and Ramsay score of the observation group at 6 hours after surgery were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).The observation group had fewer self-control analgesia compressions and sufentanil dosage 48 hours after surgery compared to the control group,and had shorter postoperative recovery time and first time out of bed activity time(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in heart rate and mean arterial pressure between the two groups at T 0(P>0.05).The heart rate and mean arterial pressure of both groups increased at T 1 and T 2 compared to T 0,but the heart rate and mean arterial pressure of the observation group were lower than those of the control group at T 1 and T 2(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of bilateral QLB-LSAL under ultrasound guidance in total hysterectomy for endometrial cancer patients can achieve ideal analgesic and sedative effects,maintain patient hemodynamic stability,and reduce the dosage of anesthetic drugs and adverse anesthesia reactions.
作者 周洁 杨卫华 ZHOU Jie;YANG Weihua(Puyang People's Hospital,Puyang,457000)
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2025年第3期421-424,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 子宫内膜癌 腹腔镜全子宫切除术 超声引导 双侧弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞 腹横肌平面阻滞 Endometrial cancer Laparoscopic total hysterectomy Ultrasound-guidance Quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament Transabdominal transverse muscle plane block anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献60

  • 1李晓菲,刘毅,翟蓉,凡丽华,范晓华.经腹结直肠手术患者采用全身麻醉联合超声引导下腰方肌阻滞镇痛效果观察[J].临床军医杂志,2020(11):1375-1376. 被引量:6
  • 2重症加强治疗病房病人镇痛和镇静治疗指南(2006)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2006,26(12):893-901. 被引量:220
  • 3DaiWai Olson,Mary Lynn,Suzanne M. Thoyre,Carmelo Graffagnino.The Limited Reliability of the Ramsay Scale[J]. Neurocritical Care . 2007 (3)
  • 4B. De Jonghe,D. Cook,C. Appere-De-Vecchi,G. Guyatt,Maureen Meade,H. Outin.Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review[J]. Intensive Care Medicine . 2000 (3)
  • 5Sessler CN,Jo Grap M,Ramsay MA,S et al.Evaluating and monitoring analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit. Journal of Critical Care . 2008
  • 6Mesnil M,Capdevila X,Bringuier S,et al.Long-term sedation in intensive care unit:a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam. Intensive Care Medicine . 2011
  • 7Mirski MA,LeDroux SN,Lewin JJ,3rd,Thompson CB,Mirski KT,Griswold M.Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool:the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation. Critical Care Medicine . 2010
  • 8Patel SB,Kress JP.Sedation and Analgesia in the Mechanically Ventilated Patient. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine . 2011
  • 9Management of the agitated intensive care unit patient. Critical Care Medicine . 2002
  • 10Kurtz P,Fitts V,Sumer Z,et al.How does care differ for neurological patients admitted to a neurocritical care unit versus a general ICU?. Neurocrit Care . 2011

共引文献3610

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部