期刊文献+

KMT2D基因突变及其共突变基因在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后中的意义

Prognostic Significance of KMT2D Gene Mutation and Its Co-mutated Genes in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨伴KMT2D基因突变弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的临床特征及其伴随突变基因对预后的影响。方法选择155例初诊DLBCL患者资料,采用二代测序方法检测包括KMT2D突变在内的475种热点基因。根据有无KMT2D基因突变将患者分为KMT2D基因突变型组及KMT2D基因野生型组,比较两组患者临床特征及伴随突变基因的差异和生存差异。结果KMT2D突变频率为31%,突变型患者以老年居多(P=0.07),双表达阳性患者较少(P=0.07)。与KMT2D基因野生型相比,KMT2D基因突变分别与CDKN2A(OR=2.82,P=0.01)和BCL2(OR=3.84,P=0.016)基因共突变率高,而与MYC(OR=0.11,P=0.013)基因突变为相互排斥。单因素生存分析显示突变型组和野生型组总生存(OS)差异无统计学意义(P=0.54),KMT2DmutBTG2mut突变患者较KMT2Dwt BTG2mut(P=0.07)、KMT2Dwt BTG2wt(P=0.05)患者具有较差的OS,而KMT-2Dmut CD79Bmut患者较KMT2Dmut CD79Bwt患者具有较好的OS趋势(P=0.09),未发现其他伴随基因对预后影响。多因素Cox回归分析结果显示,Ann Arbor分期为Ⅲ、Ⅳ期(HR=2.751,95%CI:1.169-6.472,P=0.02)、LDH水平升高(HR=2.461,95%CI:1.396-4.337,P=0.002)、Ki-67指数>80%(HR=1.875,95%CI:1.066-3.299,P=0.029)及KMT-2DmutBTG2mut(HR=4.566,95%CI:1.348-15.471,P=0.015)是DLBCL患者OS的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论KMT2D突变的DLBCL患者常伴随多种基因突变,其中伴BTG2基因突变患者预后较差。 Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL)accompanied with KMT2D gene mutation and the impact of its co-mutated genes on prognosis.Methods Clinical data of 155 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were obtained.The second-generation sequencing method was used to detect 475 hotspot genes,including KMT2D mutation.Patients were divided into the KMT2D mutation group and KMT2D wild-type group based on the presence or absence of KMT2D gene mutation.Clinical characteristics,differences in co-mutated genes,and survival differences between the two groups were compared.Results The frequency of KMT2D mutation was 31%,which is predominantly observed in elderly patients(P=0.07)and less in the double-expressor phenotype(P=0.07).Compared with the KMT2D wild-type group,KMT2D gene mutation was associated with higher co-mutation rates of CDKN2A(OR=2.82,P=0.01)and BCL2(OR=3.84,P=0.016),while being mutually exclusive with MYC gene mutation(OR=0.11,P=0.013).In univariate survival analysis,no statistically significant difference in overall survival(OS)was found between the KMT2D mutation group and the wild-type group(P=0.54).Further analysis of the prognostic significance of KMT2D with other gene mutations indicated that patients with KMT2DmutBTG2mut had poorer OS than those with KMT2Dwt BTG2mut(P=0.07)and KMT2Dwt BTG2wt(P=0.05).On the contrary,patients with KMT2Dmut CD79Bmut had better OS than those with KMT2Dmut CD79Bwt(P=0.09),with no prognostic impact observed for other co-mutated genes.Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that Ann Arbor stagesⅢandⅣ(HR=2.751,95%CI:1.169-6.472,P=0.02),elevated LDH levels(HR=2.461,95%CI:1.396-4.337,P=0.002),Ki-67 index>80%(HR=1.875,95%CI:1.066-3.299,P=0.029),and KMT2DmutBTG2mut(HR=4.566,95%CI:1.348-15.471,P=0.015)were independent risk factors for OS in patients with DLBCL(P<0.05).Conclusion DLBCL patients with KMT2D mutation often have multiple gene mutations,among which patients with a co-mutated BTG2 gene have poor prognosis.
作者 木提拜尔·米吉提 漆小龙 热那古力·阿不来提 田文昕 刘沙 马卫媛 王增胜 安利 毛敏 木合拜尔·阿布都尔 李燕 Mutibaier·MIJITI;QI Xiaolong;Renaguli·ABULAITI;TIAN Wenxin;LIU Sha;MA Weiyuan;WANG Zengsheng;AN Li;MAO Min;Muhebaier·ABUDUER;LI Yan(Department of Hematology,People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830001,China)
出处 《肿瘤防治研究》 2025年第2期127-132,共6页 Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
基金 国家自然科学基金(82360040)。
关键词 弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤 二代测序 KMT2D基因 共突变 预后 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Next-generation sequencing KMT2D gene Co-mutation Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Korl AD, le Gessie S, Snijder S, et al. Primary extranodal non- Hodgkin' s lymphoma (NHL): the impact of alternative defini- tions tested in the Comprehensive Cancer Centre West popula- tion-based NHL registry. Ann Oncol, 2003, 14:131-139.
  • 2Li XQ, Li GD, Gao ZF, et al. The relative frequencies of lympho- ma subtypes in China: a nationwide study of 10002 cases by the Chinese Lymphoma Study Group. Ann Oncol, 2011, 22 Suppl 4: ivl41.
  • 3Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, et al. Comparison of a stan- dard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regi- mens for advanced non-Hodgkin' s lymphoma. N Engl J Med, 1993, 328:1002-1006.
  • 4Reyes F, Lepage E, Ganem G, et al. ACVBP versus CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352:1197-1205.
  • 5Coiffier B, Thieblemont C, Van Den Neste E,et ah Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemother- apy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Grouped' Etudes des Lymphomes de 1' Adulte. Blood, 2010, 116:2040-2045.
  • 6Seki R, Ohshima K, Nagafuji K, et al. Rituximab in combination with CHOP chemotherapy for the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in Japan: a retrospective analysis of 1,057 cases from Kyushu Lymphoma Study Group. Int J Hematol, 2010, 9 I: 258-266.
  • 7Sehn LH, Donaldson J, Chhanabhai M, et al. Introduction of combined CHOP plus rituximab therapy dramatically improved outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23:5027-5033.
  • 8Habermama TM, Weller EA, Morrison VA, et al. Rituximab- CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in old- er patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24:3121-3127.
  • 9Tilly H, Dreyling M. ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin' s lymphoma: ESMO clinical recom- mendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol, 2008, Suppl 2:ii67-69.
  • 10NCCN Guidelines. Non-Hodgkin' s Lymphomas, version 2.2012.

共引文献302

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部