摘要
谦抑性原理本身并不具有独立的立法批判机能,对该原理有必要重新理解和定位:一是可以将其视为描述性概念;二是可将其视为批判性概念。就后者而言,其批判力不是源于其本身,而是源于对其进行填充的法益保护理论和比例原则。预防刑法能够通过法益保护理论和比例原则的审查,因为它所保护的是适格法益、具备有效性、不可替代性和经济性,因此并不违背谦抑性原理。作为描述性概念,谦抑性原理可分为绝对合理的谦抑性和相对合理的谦抑性。预防刑法只可能实现相对合理的谦抑性,而不可能实现绝对合理的谦抑性,这就要求我们对预防刑法的批评不能过于严苛,而要保留一定的宽容。
The principle of modesty does not have an independent legislative criticism function,and it is necessary to re-understand and position this principle:firstly,it can be regarded as a descriptive concept;Secondly,it can be regarded as a critical concept.As for the latter,its critical power does not stem from itself,but from the theory of legal interest protection and the principle of proportionality that fills it in.Preventive criminal law can be reviewed through the theory of legal interest protection and the principle of proportionality,as it protects appropriate legal interests,has effectiveness,cannot be replaced,and is economical,therefore it does not violate the principle of bumility.As a descriptive concept,the principle of modesty can be divided into absolute reasonable modesty and relatively reasonable modesty.Preventive criminal law can only achieve relatively reasonable modesty,but cannot achieve absolute reasonable modesty.This requires us to not be too harsh in our criticism of preventive criminal law,but to retain a certain degree of tolerance.
出处
《刑法论丛》
2023年第1期79-111,共33页
Criminal Law Review
关键词
预防刑法
谦抑性原理
法益保护理论
比例原则
preventive criminal law
modesty principle
legal interest protection theory
proportionality principle
