摘要
由于各国在数字贸易竞争中有不同的利益与立场,故数字贸易概念还没有得到统一和权威的界定。美国对数字贸易概念界定经历了从“窄”到“宽”再回到“窄”的过程,最终将跨境电子商务货物贸易排除在外。2020年,OECD、IMF和WTO共同发布迄今为止最全面的数字贸易定义。从自身优势领域出发,中国对数字贸易概念界定应涵盖跨境电子商务货物贸易、数字产品与数字服务贸易以及数据贸易。WTO、RTAs和双边经贸协定中都有关于数字贸易及数字贸易便利化规则,但由于各国立场不同,规则的侧重点也各不相同。未来中国应在跨境电子商务及其便利化上落实和深化RCEP,并积极推广至“一带一路”共建国家;在数字产品与数字服务贸易自由化、数据贸易自由化上,应兼顾安全与效率,尽快对接CPTPP和DEPA中的高标准规则。
Due to the different interests and positions of different countries in the competition of digital trade,the concept of digital trade has not been unified and authoritatively defined.The definition of digital trade in the United States has gone through a process from"narrow"to"wide"and then back to"narrow",eventually excluding cross-border e-commerce goods trade.In 2020,the OECD,IMF and WTO jointly released the most comprehensive definition of digital trade to date.Starting from its own advantages,China's definition of digital trade should cover cross-border e-commerce goods trade,digital products and digital services,and data trade.The WTO,RTAs and bilateral economic and trade agreements all have rules on digital trade and digital trade facilitation,but the rules have different priorities due to different positions.In the future,China should implement and deepen RCEP in cross-border e-commerce and its facilitation,and actively promote it to countries along the"Belt and Road Initiative";in the liberalization of digital products and digital service trade,as well as data trade,China should balance security and efficiency and swiftly align with the high standards of the CPTPP and DEPA.
作者
周跃雪
ZHOU Yuexue(Law school,Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang,Sichuan 621010,China)
出处
《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第6期71-83,共13页
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
基金
绵阳市社会科学研究规划一般项目(19sd3105)。
关键词
数字贸易
数字贸易便利化
跨境电子商务
数字产品与数字服务
数据贸易
Digital Trade
Digital Trade Facilitation
Cross-Border E-Commerce
Digital Products and Digital Services
Data Trade
