期刊文献+

高校新一轮本科教育教学审核评估的推进理路探析 被引量:1

Advancing Logic for the New-round Undergraduate-level Teaching Review and Assessment of Colleges and Universities
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 新一轮本科教育教学审核评估是在继承上一轮审核评估基础上进行的,评估尺度、评估周期、操作流程、核心观念、结果标示等方面保持原样,但在评审方法、结果使用、风险规划、质量文化、基准比对等方面进行了改进。从新一轮普通高校本科教育教学审核评估方案来看,它改变了以往高校本科教育教学审核评估管理模式,提倡高校本科教育教学审核评估价值性理念与应然指向,构建完整的高校应用治理评估机制,以强调各高校本科教育教学审核评估结果的重要性。高校审核评估方案需要以高校教育教学评估指标体系为指导方向,以便化解各高校评估治理方式的矛盾,遵循高校本科教育教学规律,构建科学、适用的审核评估指标体系,力求教育教学质量管理与评估专业化发展的高度统一。 A new round of undergraduate education and teaching evaluation was launched by Ministry of Education.The experiences from the previous round being used as a reference,the new round retains evaluation factors like evaluation scale,evaluation cycle,operational processes,core concepts,results marking.However,modifications will be made on such respects as evaluation methods,results use,risk planning,quality culture,benchmarking,and among others.The new round of undergraduate educational and teaching review and evaluation programs has changed the perspective whereby undergraduate educational and teaching management modes are examined and assessed.This change targets on valueladen concepts and developments of undergraduate examination and assessment,ensuring a complete evaluation of the applied governance theory to be constructed,highlighting the importance of evaluation results for all colleges and universities.The new review and assessment programs for undergradu-ate institutions must be guided by educational and teaching assessment index system,so contradictions arising from universities’evaluation governance can be disposed of.Observing undergraduate education and teaching laws enables the new review and assessment programs to develop into a scientific and applicable assessment index system;a high degree of unity between education and teaching levels control and professional improvement of evaluation can be achieved.
作者 熊晓辉 Xiong Xiaohui
出处 《阿坝师范学院学报》 2023年第4期49-54,共6页 Journal of Aba Teachers University
关键词 新一轮 审核评估 推进理路 特点 路径 a new round review and evaluation advancing logic characteristics path
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献46

  • 1袁益民.院校评估如何支持院校质量改进[J].高教探索,2011(1):50-54. 被引量:6
  • 2王同亿.英汉辞海[K].北京:国防工业出版社,1987:2766.
  • 3David Woodhouse. Achievement and Progress.. Individual ~ Collective. INQAAHE 2011 ConferenceEZ]. April 2011.
  • 4New Zealand Universities Academic Audit Unit[Z]. Academic Audit Manual for Use in Cycle 4 Academic Audits,2007.
  • 5University of Amsterdam. Quality Assurance Framework[EB/OL]. http://www, uva. nl/en/ about-the-uva/uva-profile/mission-and-identity/policy-documents/quality-assurance- frame- work/quality-assurance-framework, html, 2014-09-12.
  • 6University of Queensland. Quality management and Assuranee[EB/OL-]. https..//www, li- brary, uq. edu. au/about-us/quality-managernent-and-assurance,2015-10-05.
  • 7Cameron Kim, and Wesley Sine. A Framework for Organizational Quality CultureEJ3. Qual- ity Management Journal 6(4), 1999 .. 7-25.
  • 8Carolyn Campbell. Changing Perceptions of Independence from the Perspective of Both EQA and Institutions[Z]. INQAAHE Members' Forum, 18 April,2012.
  • 9Josep A. Ferr6. Independence of Quality Assurance Visa Vis Different Stakeholders. IN- QAAHE 2011 Conference[Z]. April 2011.
  • 10桑新民.全球化视野中高等教育信息化发展的新潮流——东亚研究型大学网络文化共建共享的战略思考[J].复旦教育论坛,2009,7(1):15-20. 被引量:8

共引文献114

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部