期刊文献+

14条目和6条目弗莱堡正念调查量表在胃肠癌患者中的心理测量学评价 被引量:2

Psychometric evaluation of 14-item and 6-item Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory among patients with gastrointestinal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的开发适用于临床患者的简版弗莱堡正念调查量表。方法对山东省肿瘤医院411例胃肠癌患者进行施测,基于项目分析和探索性因子分析对14条目弗莱堡正念调查量表(FMI-14)进行简化。选用心理弹性、疾病感知和感知压力作为效标关联指标。采用SPSS 22.0和Mplus 7.4进行数据的描述和分析。结果根据项目分析和探索性因子分析结果,FMI-14共删除8个条目,最终保留3个觉知条目和3个接纳条目。6条目弗莱堡正念调查量表(FMI-6)的Cronbach’sα系数为0.831,Guttman折半信度系数为0.848。验证性因子模型拟合良好,指标为卡方自由度比值(χ^(2)/df)=1.892,比较适配指数(CFI)=0.991,非规准适配指数(TLI)=0.982,标准化残差均方根(SRMR)=0.029,渐进残差均方和平方根(RMSEA)=0.064。正念与心理弹性、疾病感知和感知压力呈显著相关(r=0.679,r=-0.522,r=-0.571,均P<0.001)。结论FMI-6具有良好的心理测量学特性,且基本准确涵盖了FMI-14的内容,可以有效提高施测效率,有利于在临床患者中使用和推广。 Objective To test the applicability of the simplified Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory(FMI)in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.Methods Totally 411 patients with gastrointestinal cancer were recruited from Shandong Cancer Hospital,and the 14-item FMI(FMI-14)was simplified based on item analysis and exploratory factor analysis.Mplus 7.4 and SPSS 22.0 were used for data description and analysis.Results A total of 8 items were deleted,and 3 presence items and 3 acceptance items were retained.The Cronbachsαcoefficient of the 6-item FMI(FMI-6)was 0.831,and the Guttmans split-half reliability was 0.848.The confirmatory factor model fitted well(χ^(2)/df=1.892,CFI=0.991,TLI=0.982,SRMR=0.029,RMSEA=0.064).The total score of FMI-6 was significantly associated with resilience,illness perception,and perceived stress(r=0.679,r=-0.522,r=-0.571,all P<0.001).Conclusion The 6-item FMI has good psychometric properties,and can be used to evaluate mindfulness level of patients in clinic.
作者 赵迪 吕高荣 李国鹏 张云雪 王伟民 董晓玲 厉萍 ZHAO Di;LYU Gaorong;LI Guopeng;ZHANG Yunxue;WANG Weimin;DONG Xiaoling;LI Ping(School of Nursing and Rehabilitation,Cheeloo College of Medicine,Shandong University,Jinan 250012,Shandong,China;Ambulatory Care Center,Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute,Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences,Jinan 250117,Shandong,China;Department of Colorectal Surgery,Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute,Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences,Jinan 250117,Shandong,China)
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2023年第6期87-91,102,共6页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(82272923)。
关键词 胃肠癌患者 正念 信度 效度 心理测量 Patients with gastrointestinal cancer Mindfulness Reliability Validity Psychometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献67

  • 1童馨,安东梅,McGonigal A,Park SP,周东.广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)在中国癫痫患者中的检验[J].癫痫杂志,2016,2(5):469-469. 被引量:43
  • 2李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:539
  • 3肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,4(2):98-100. 被引量:4867
  • 4[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 5[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 6[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 7[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 8[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 9[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 10[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162

共引文献1574

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部