2Taylor, S. E. , Schneider, S.K. Coping and the simulation of e- vents. Social Cognition, 1989, 7(2) , 174 - 194.
3Markman, K.D. , Kray, L J. & Galinsky, A.D. Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical prob- lem solving. The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 33(3), 312 -324.
4Sanna, L.J. , Turley, K.J. Antecedents to spontaneous eounterfac- tual thinking: effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1996, 22 ( 9 ) , 906 -919.
5Markman, K. D. , McMullen, M.N. A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2003, 3, 244- 267.
6Pham, L. B. & Taylor, S.E. From thought to action: effects of process- versus outcome -based mental simulations on perform- ance. The society for personality and social psychology, 1999, 25 (2), 250-260.
7Sanna, L.J. ,Carter, S.E. & Burkley, E. Yesterday,today, and tomorrow : Counterfactual thinking and beyond. In A. J. Strathman&J. A. Jolreman ( Eds. ) , Understanding behavior in the context of time : Theory, research, and application. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum,2005, 165 - 185.
8Ray, R. D. , Ochsner, K.N. Individual differences in trait rumina- tion and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal. Cogni- tive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2005, 5 (2), 156 - 168.
9Par.ks, C.D. , Sanna, L. J, Posey, D.C. Retrospection in social dilemmas: how thinking about the past affects future cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 84(5 ), 988 - 996.
10Kray, L.J. & Galinsky, A.D. The debiasing effect of counterfac- tual mind - sets : Increasing the search for disconfirmatory informa- tion in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci- sion Processes, 2003, 91, 69- 81.
