期刊文献+

“算法资本主义”的政治经济学批判阐释 被引量:32

A Critical Interpretation of the Political Economy of“Algorithmic Capitalism”
原文传递
导出
摘要 处于特定的以资本原则为主导的社会形态中的“算法”,已经成为人们感知和观察世界的新“神话”。当“算法”被建构为认知的“图式论”信念,成为新的“生命政治”的治理手段,以及蜕变为资本的增殖工具时,造成了与现代世界文明的“悖反”。通过对算法运行机制的分析可以看到,算法内在地蕴含了设计者的预期“利益”,并且,算法及其平台由于在资本的操控下,不仅在数据引导的能力上,同时,也在数据的占有上形成了垄断,从而操纵各种数据资源去完成资本增殖的目的,加深了对劳动者的剥削程度。为此,对算法引发的问题矫正方案在于:借助于政治经济学批判,在充分发挥算法在社会发展中的积极作用的同时,也要警惕资本为了追逐利益在对算法运用时所造成的负面影响。在社会主义生产力发展要求下,我们必须把握好“苦于算法之发展与苦于算法之不发展”的现实境遇,使其更加有助于推进中国式现代化建设。 The“algorithm”in a particular social formation dominated by the principle of capital has become a new“myth”for people to perceive and observe the world.When the“algorithm”is constructed as a cognitive“schematic”belief,as a means of governance in the new“politics of life”and as a tool for the multiplication of capital,it creates a“paradox”with the modern world civilization.The analysis of the algorithm’s operation mechanism shows that the algorithm inherently contains the designer’s anticipated“interests”,and that the algorithm and its platform are manipulated by capital,not only in terms of the ability to guide data,but also in terms of the monopoly of data possession,thus manipulating various data resources to achieve the goal of capital multiplication and deepening the degree of exploitation of laborers.In this regard,the correction plan for the problems caused by algorithms lies in the following:while giving full play to the positive role of algorithms in social development through the critique of political economy,it is also necessary to be alert to the negative effects caused by the use of algorithms by capital in pursuit of profit.Under the requirement of the development of socialist productivity,we must grasp the reality of“suffering from the development of algorithms and suffering from the non-development of algorithms”,so as to make the algorithms more helpful to promote the construction of Chinese style modernization.
作者 孙亮 Sun Liang
出处 《马克思主义研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第11期123-132,156,共11页 Studies on Marxism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献11

共引文献80

同被引文献331

引证文献32

二级引证文献168

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部