读写双链二语写作教学模式:理据与实践被引量：2

The Reading&Writing Dual-Chained Model of L2 Writing Instruction:Its Rationale and Practice

导出

摘要本文通过二语课堂教学实践阐述“读写双链二语写作教学模式”的理据。首先,二语写作教师通过精讲遴选的文本,引导学生进行“感知-加工-再加工-内化”文本,借此熟悉好作文标准,同时引导学生独立地深度加工文本,从而获得自我发现,这就是“感知-加工-再加工-内化文本阅读链”的理据。其次,教师检查学生产出文本,监控其写作特征与质量,给出诊断性反馈让其修改,学生参照多次反馈做多次修改,深化对原文的感知,这就是“产出-监控-反馈-修改/再修改写作链”的理据。这一探索性“读写双链二语写作教学模式”可以有效提高学生的二语读写水平。 This paper succinctly explicates the rationale behind an L2 writing instruction model practiced in classroom.Firstly,the Reading Chain consists of such links as student initial text perceiving,teacher-guided preliminary processing and student-regulated self-discovery prior to deeper text processing.Whereas,the Writing Chain comprises such links as student producing and teacher monitoring of texts,relevant types of feedback given to student writers,subsequent student revision and further feedback-referenced revision.Being exploratory in nature,this model has proven to enable student writers to improve their L2 writing competence.

作者臧庆徐海铭管晶晶 ZANG Qing;XU Haiming;GUAN Jingjing

机构地区南京邮电大学外语学院上海外国语大学英语学院上海海事大学外语学院

出处《当代外语研究》 CSSCI 2022年第6期86-94,共9页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies

关键词读写双链二语写作教学模式好作文标准内化产出反馈修改 reading&writing-dual-chained L2 writing instruction model quality-writing standards internalization production feedback revision

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1文秋芳.构建“产出导向法”理论体系[J].外语教学与研究,2015,47(4):547-558. 被引量：3072

二级参考文献24

1王策三.论教师的主导作用和学生的主体地位[J].北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）,1983(6):70-76. 被引量：156
2黄月圆,顾曰国.以学生为中心,多维一体的大学英语教学法[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(2):9-13. 被引量：105
3杨忠.培养技能发展智能——外语教育工具性与人文性的统一[J].外语学刊,2007(6):133-137. 被引量：97
4Larsen-Freeman, D. 2005. Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring [M~. Bos- ton, MA:. Thomson Heinle.
5Collins, J. & N. O'Brien (eds.). 2003. Greenwood Dictionary of Education ~-Z~. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
6Hanten, G., X. Li, S. Chapman, P. Swank, J. Gamino, G. Roberson&H. Levin. 2007. De- velopment of verbal selective learning [J]. Developmental Neuropsychology 32 (1). 585-596.
7Kirschner, P., J. Sweller & R. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, expe- riential, and inquiry-based teaching [J]. Educational Psychologist 4(2) : 75-86.
8Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications I-M3. London: Longman.
9Long, M. 1983. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of com- prehensible input [J]. Applied Linguistics 4:126-141.
10Long, M. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition I-A3. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C3. SanDiego: Academic Press. 413-468.