期刊文献+

体素内不相干运动和动态增强MRI对早期子宫内膜癌与子宫内膜息肉的鉴别诊断 被引量:15

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Differentiation Between Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma and Endometrial Polyp
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨动态增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)和体素内不相干运动成像(IVIM)鉴别正常子宫内膜、子宫内膜息肉(EP)和早期(I期)子宫内膜癌(EC)的价值。资料与方法回顾性收集2021年1月—2022年1月新乡医学院第一附属医院行盆腔MRI检查的20例正常子宫内膜、17例EP和30例早期EC,分别测量DCE-MRI参数容积转移常数(Ktrans)、速率常数(Kep)和血管外细胞外容积分数(Ve),以及IVIM参数真性扩散系数(D)、假性扩散系数(D*)和灌注分数(f)。比较不同组间各参数的差异,采用受试者工作特征曲线评估各参数的诊断效能,采用Logistic回归分析进行多参数联合诊断,评价不同参数间的相关性。结果EP组的Ktrans(t=-3.347,P=0.002)和Kep(Z=-1.981,P=0.048)高于正常组,EC组的Ktrans(t=-4.316、-2.447,P均<0.05)和Kep(Z=-5.248、-4.650,P均<0.05)均高于正常组和EP组,D(t=2.884、2.941,P均<0.01)、f(t=3.100、2.874,P均<0.01)和Ve(t=3.846、4.288,P均<0.01)均低于正常组和EP组。DCE-MRI、Ktrans和Kep鉴别正常子宫内膜和EP的曲线下面积分别为0.735、0.732、0.691。DCE-MRI、IVIM、Kep、Ve、D、f和Ktrans鉴别EP和EC的曲线下面积分别为0.920、0.841、0.912、0.820、0.764、0.686、0.682。DCE-MRI、IVIM、Kep、Ktrans、Ve、D和f鉴别EC和正常子宫内膜的曲线下面积分别为0.958、0.867、0.942、0.850、0.762、0.709、0.699。D与Ktrans和Kep均呈负相关(r=-0.251、-0.270,P均<0.05),f与Ktrans和Kep均呈负相关(r=-0.289、-0.360,P均<0.05)。结论DCE-MRI和IVIM鉴别EC与EP有类似的效能,且部分参数之间存在一定的相关性。 Purpose To explore the value of intravoxel incoherent motion(IVIM)and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(DCE-MRI)in the differentiation of normal endometrium,endometrial polyp(EP)and early-stage(stage I)endometrial carcinoma(EC).Materials and Methods Twenty subjects with normal endometrium,17 patients with EP and 30 patients with early-stage EC who underwent pelvic MRI from January 2021 to January 2022 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University were retrospectively collected.Moreover,the DCE-MRI parameters,including volume transfer constant(Ktrans),rate transfer constant(Kep)and volume of extravascular extracellular space per unit volume of tissue(Ve);and IVIM parameters,including diffusion coefficient(D),pseudo diffusion coefficient(D*)and perfusion fraction(f)were measured and compared,respectively among three groups.Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each parameter,respectively.Logistic regression analysis was used for the combined diagnosis of different parameters,and the correlation between different parameters with each other was also evaluated.Results Ktrans(t=-3.347,P=0.002)and Kep(Z=-1.981,P=0.048)in EP group were significantly higher than those in normal group.Ktrans(t=-4.316,-2.447,both P<0.05)and Kep(Z=-5.248,-4.650,P<0.05)in EC group were significantly higher than those in normal group and EP group.D(t=2.884,2.941,P<0.01),f(t=3.100,2.874,P<0.01)and Ve(t=3.846,4.288,P<0.001)in EC group were significantly lower than those in normal group and EP group.For normal and EP groups,area under the curve of DCE-MRI,Ktransand Kepwere 0.735,0.732 and 0.691,respectively.For EP and EC groups,the area under the curve of DCE-MRI,IVIM,Kep,Ve,D,f and Ktranswere 0.920,0.841,0.912,0.820,0.764,0.686 and 0.682,respectively.For normal and EC groups,the area under the curve of DCE-MRI,IVIM,Kep,Ktrans,Ve,D and f were0.958,0.867,0.942,0.850,0.762,0.709 and 0.699,respectively.D showed low negative correlation with Ktransand Kep(r=-0.251,-0.270,P<0.05),f showed low negative correlation with Ktransand Kep(r=-0.289,-0.360,P<0.05).Conclusion DCE-MRI and IVIM have similar efficacy in EC and EP identification,with some correlations between some parameters.
作者 刘旺毅 闫瑞芳 任继鹏 王红霞 谢北辰 韩东明 LIU Wangyi;YAN Ruifang;REN Jipeng;WANG Hongxia;XIE Beichen;HAN Dongming(Department of Magnetic Resonance,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University,Weihui 453100,China)
出处 《中国医学影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期65-71,共7页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 伦琴影像科研专项(HN-20201017-002)。
关键词 子宫内膜肿瘤 子宫内膜息肉 磁共振成像 体素内不相干运动成像 诊断 鉴别 Endometrial neoplasms Endometrial polyp Magnetic resonance imaging Intravoxel incoherent motion Diagnosis differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献74

  • 1尹雪彬,沈铿,郎景和.子宫内膜癌的病理分类、治疗及预后影响因素的现代观[J].中华妇产科杂志,1996,31(8):508-511. 被引量:23
  • 2王建六.子宫内膜癌[A].见:彭芝兰,张家文.流行病学[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2010.7.
  • 3Wang J,Yu T,Bai R,et al. The value of the apparent diffusion coeffi- cient in differentiating stage I A endometrial carcinoma from normal endometrium and benign diseases of the endometrium:initial study at 3-T magnetic resonance scanner[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr,2010, 34 ( 3 ) :332-337.
  • 4Hase S, Mitsumori A, Inai R, et al. Endometrial Polyps : MR Imaging Features[ J]. Acta Medica Okayama,2012,66(6) :475-485.
  • 5Fujii S, Matsusue E, Kigawa J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the appar- ent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results [J]. Eur Radiol,2008, 18 (2) :384-389.
  • 6Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer:differentiation from benign endometriallesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion [ J ]. Acta Radio1,2009,50 ( 8 ) :947-953.
  • 7Seo JM, Kim CK, Choi D, et al. Endometrial Cancer: Utility of Diffu- sion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Background Body Signal Suppression at 3 T [ J ]. J Magn Resort Imaging, 2013,37 ( 5 ) : 1151-1159.
  • 8Bharwani N, Miquel ME, Sahdev A, et al. Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the assessment of tumour grade in endometrial cancer[ J ]. Br J Ra- diol,2011,84(1007) :997-1004.
  • 9Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, Laheij RJ, et al. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging [ J ]. Radiology, 2003,229 : 248 -254.
  • 10Ozduman K, Yildiz E, Dincer A, et al. Using intraoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced T1 -weighted MRI to identify residual tumor in glioblastoma surgery [ J ]. J Neurosurg,2014 ,120 :60-66.

共引文献224

同被引文献147

引证文献15

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部