摘要
现有多元行政诉讼证明标准在司法实践中出现了选择困难、使用混乱的问题,伤害了法安定性。其原因是以行政行为类型化为基础的多元证明标准,难以与“当事人权利义务的被影响程度”精准匹配。统一行政诉讼证明标准在兼顾公正与效率,发挥对行政权既谦抑又全面的监督作用,与行政执法程序有效衔接等方面更具优势。在行政法法典化背景下,基于证明标准“模糊性”“整体性”的特质,通过以“高度盖然性”为核心进行具体设计,可以克服旧有多元标准的不足,并与行政执法程序的统一相一致,亦更加符合行政诉讼对行政行为合法性进行全面审查的要求。
The existing multiple standards of proof in administrative litigation have some problems in judicial practice,such as difficulty in choosing and confusion in using,which hurt the stability of law.The reason is that the traditional multiple proof standards are based on typification and cannot achieve an effective allocation with the actual degree of impact on the rights and interests of the parties.The unified administrative litigation proof standard has more advantages in taking into account justice and efficiency;exerting a modest and comprehensive supervisory role over administrative power;and effectively connecting with administrative law enforcement procedures.Under the characteristics of"fuzziness"and"integrity"of the standard of proof,the specific design with"high probability"as the core can overcome the shortcomings of the old multiple standards,and be consistent with the unification of administrative procedures under the background of codification,and also more meet the requirements for a comprehensive review of the legality of administrative actions.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2022年第4期101-108,共8页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“行政法总则制定的理论与实践问题研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:21&ZD191。
关键词
证明标准
法典化
高度盖然性
排除合理怀疑
standard of proof
codified
high probability
beyond a reasonable doubt
