摘要
作为统筹国内经济发展和全球气候变化协同共赢的重大战略,碳中和治理的本质属性为社会公共事务治理,这决定了原有环境治理体系中单一性主导的治理模式无法适配碳中和治理愿景的秩序期待。究其原因,在于政府与企业、公众间的“权力—权利”结构失衡,导致碳中和治理陷入“主治”而非“共治”桎梏中。在构建多元主体参与碳中和治理的秩序新范式的过程中,协同治理理论与超越还原主义环境治理观可以为碳中和单维治理向多元共治思维转变的正当性背书,这也决定了碳中和愿景下多元共治的实践样态应从“政府主导碳中和治理的法治进路、企业承担碳中和治理主体责任进路、公众能动参与碳中和治理进路”这“三位一体”的基本构造予以具体展开。
The essential attribute of carbon neutral governance, a major strategy to coordinate domestic economic development and global climate change, is the governance over social public affairs, which determines the failure in the order expection in the adaptation of the single-dominant governance model in the original environmental governance system for the vision of carbon neutral governance. The reason lies in the structural imbalance between the government and enterprises, and that among the public “power-right”, which drags carbon neutral governance into a shackle of “dominant governance” rather than “shared governance”. In the process of building a new paradigm of order in which multiple subjects participate in carbon neutral governance, the theory of collaborative governance and the concept of beyond reductionist environmental governance can endorse the justification of the transformation of thinking from single-dimensional carbon neutral governance to multiple co-governance. This also results in the practical pattern of multiple co-governance under the vision of carbon neutrality in the basic structure of “trinity”: the legal perspective of government guidance, the duty perpsective of enterprises as main governing subjects, and the governing pespective of active participation of the public.
作者
王灿发
邸卫佳
张祖增
WANGCan-fa;DIWei-jia;ZHANGZu-zeng(Institute of Environmental Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China;School of Law,Shanxi University,Taiyuan Shanxi 030006,China)
出处
《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第6期1-10,共10页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目“陆海统筹生态环境治理法律制度研究”(21A2D062)。
关键词
气候变化应对
碳中和治理
多元共治
法治进路
公众参与
climate change response
carbon neutral governance
multiple co-governance
the legal approach
public participation
