期刊文献+

多孔腹腔镜根治术治疗宫颈癌的疗效及对患者负性情绪和预后的影响 被引量:9

Efficacy of multiport laparoscopic radical resection in the treatment of cervical cancer and its impact on negative emotion and prognosis of patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨多孔腹腔镜根治术治疗宫颈癌的疗效及对患者负性情绪和预后的影响。方法将150例宫颈癌患者按手术方法的不同分为观察组75例和对照组75例,对照组采用传统开腹手术,观察组采用多孔腹腔镜根治术。比较两组患者围手术期指标及并发症发生情况;比较两组患者手术前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、健康调查简表(SF-36)评分;随访至术后6个月,记录患者复发率及淋巴结转移、性功能障碍发生情况。结果观察组患者术中出血量少于对照组,术后排气时间、住院时间、尿管留置时间均短于对照组,并发症总发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。术后,两组患者SAS、SDS评分均降低,且观察组患者SAS、SDS评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。术后,两组患者SF-36各维度评分均升高,且观察组患者SF-36各维度评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。两组患者淋巴结转移、性功能障碍发生率及复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。结论腹腔镜根治术在治疗宫颈癌中有显著优势,可有效切除病灶,加快患者术后肠道恢复速度,降低并发症发生率,改善患者负性情绪,提高生活质量。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of multiport laparoscopic radical resection in the treatment of cervical cancer and its impact on negative emotion and prognosis of patients.Method A total of 150 patients with cervical cancer were divided into observation group of 75 cases and control group of 75 cases according to different surgical methods.The control group was treated with traditional laparotomy,and the observation group was treated with multiport laparoscopic radical resection.The perioperative indicators and complications were compared between the two groups.The scores of the self-rating anxiety scale(SAS),self-rating depression scale(SDS),and the MOS 36-item short form health survey(SF-36)were compared between the two groups before and after the operation.The patients were followed up to 6 months after the operation,and the recurrence rate,lymph node metastasis,and sexual dysfunction were recorded during this period.Result The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less,the postoperative exhaust time,hospitalization time,and urinary catheter indwelling time were all shorter,and the total incidence of complications was lower than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After the operation,the SAS and SDS scores of the two groups were decreased,and the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After the operation,the scores of SF-36 in the two groups were increased,and the scores of SF-36 in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the incidence of lymph node metastasis,sexual dysfunction,and recurrence between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic radical resection has remarkable advantages in the treatment of cervical cancer.The intervention could effectively remove lesions,speed up postoperative intestinal recovery,reduce the incidence of complications,improve patients’negative emotions,and improve their life quality.
作者 赵阳 张晓莲 王丹丹 ZHAO Yang;ZHANG Xiaolian;WANG Dandan(Department of Gynaecology,Dalian Municipal Women and Children’s Medical Center(Group),Dalian 116021,Liaoning,China)
出处 《癌症进展》 2022年第21期2237-2240,共4页 Oncology Progress
关键词 宫颈癌 负性情绪 多孔腹腔镜根治术 预后 疗效 cervical cancer negative emotion multiport laparoscopic radical resection prognosis efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献133

  • 1王敏敏,王靖婧,褚明晨,庞林华,陈慧飞.加速康复外科在预防妇科腹腔镜手术术后恶心呕吐的应用效果研究[J].中国全科医学,2019,0(S02):210-212. 被引量:11
  • 2马谋超,汪培庄.心理学的方法学探讨——心理的模糊性及模糊统计试验评注[J].心理学报,1985,17(2):177-186. 被引量:19
  • 3周念东,任丽,陈宏.门诊、住院病人抑郁症的调查[J].人民军医,2004,47(12):719-720. 被引量:3
  • 4Borah G,Rankin M,Wey P.Psychological complications in 281 plastic surgery practices[J].Plast Reconstr Sarg,1999,104 (5):1241-1246.
  • 5Beck AT,Alford BA.Depression:causes and treatment[M].2ed ed.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press,2009:12.
  • 6Steven T,Mark S,Chartes RH.The Zung self-rating depression scale[J].Assessment,2002,9 (4):401-405.
  • 7Prat J.FIGO staging for uterine sarcoma.Int J Gynecol Obstet,2009,104:177-179.
  • 8Pecorelli S,Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva,cervix,and endometrium.Int J Gynecol Obstet,2009,105:103-104.
  • 9Kim HS,Song YS.International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system revised:what should be considered critically for gynecologic cancer? J Gynecol Oncol,2009,20:135-136.
  • 10Hacker NF.Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva.Int J Gynecol Obstet,2009,105:105-106.

共引文献1745

同被引文献112

引证文献9

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部