任务复杂度与汉语二语写作词汇的关系研究被引量：4

The Relationship Between Task Complexity And Lexical Performance in Writing of CSL

导出

摘要本研究以Skehan&Foster的有限注意力模型和Robinson的认知假设模型为理论基础,探讨“任务涉及因素多少”“推理要求高低”控制下的任务复杂度对汉语二语写作词汇广度和深度的影响。北京语言大学、浙江师范大学本科二、三年级共61名留学生参与了本次研究。结果发现,不论是词汇广度还是词汇深度,都部分支持了有限注意力模型,即随着任务复杂度的提升,学习者更倾向于将注意力资源集中到语言内容的加工上,而对语言形式有所忽视。 Based on the Limited Attentional Capacity Model of Skehan & Foster and the Cognitive Hypothesis Model of Robinson,the study investigates the effects of task complexity controlled by +/-few elements and +/-no reasoning demands on the lexical breadth and depth of writing in Chinese as second language.A total of 61 second-year and third-year undergraduate international students from Zhejiang Normal University and Beijing Language and Culture University participated in this study.The results of this study partially support the Limited Attentional Capacity Model in both lexical breadth and lexical depth,that is,with the increase of task complexity,learners tend to focus on the processing of language content and ignore the language form.

作者王佶旻何赟 WANG Ji-min;HE Yun(Beijing Language and Culture University,Beijing 100083)

机构地区北京语言大学国际学生教育政策与评价研究院

出处《汉语学习》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第4期81-91,共11页 Chinese Language Learning

基金国家社会科学基金重大项目“汉语交际能力标准与测评体系研究”(项目编号:15ZDB101) 北京语言大学梧桐创新平台项目“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”(项目编号:21PT02)的资助。

关键词任务复杂度任务涉及因素多少推理要求高低词汇广度词汇深度 task complexity +/-few elements +/-no reasoning demands breadth and depth of vocabulary

分类号 H195.3 [语言文字—汉语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1黄立,钱旭菁.第二语言汉语学习者的生成性词汇知识考察——基于看图作文的定量研究[J].汉语学习,2003(1):56-61. 被引量：34
2王静萍.资源指引型的任务复杂度对二语写作语言表现的影响[J].外语教学,2013,34(4):65-68. 被引量：37

二级参考文献33

1李绍林.高水平汉语阅读难点词语调查及其有关问题[J].语言文字应用,1995(3):82-87. 被引量：5
2鲁健骥.中介语理论与外国人学习汉语的语音偏误分析[J].语言教学与研究,1984(3):44-56. 被引量：212
3Arnold, E. Measurements and perceptions of writing development: Omani academic writers in English[ J]. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2008,4( 1 ) : 42-55.
4Bygate, M. Quality of language and purpose of task : Patterns of learn- ers' language on two oral communication tasks[ J]. Language Teach- ing Research, 1999(3) : 185-214.
5Ellis, R. & Yuan, F. The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing[ J ]. Studies in Sec- ond Language Acquisition, 2004(26) : 59-84.
6Hunt, K. Recent measures in syntactic development[ A]. In Lester, M. (ed.). Reading in Applied Transformational Grammar[ C]. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970: 179-192.
7Ishikawa, T. The effect of manipulating task complexity along the ( + Here-and-Now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse[ A 1. In C. M. Garcia-Mayo (ed.). Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning[C]. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 2006: 136-156.
8Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing [ J 1. International Review of Applied Lin- guistics, 2007 (45) : 261-284.
9Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2008( 17 ): 48-60.
10Larsen-Freeman, D. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accu- racy in the oral and written production of five Chinese leamers of Eng- lish[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2006, 27(4): 590-619.