摘要
清代以来,学者们关于《二十四诗品》是否具有体系这一问题始终众说纷纭、莫衷一是,其中以“周易体系说”最具代表性。各种“周易体系说”或侧重于总体架构,或侧重于各品顺序,或二者兼而有之,但都存在着逻辑错误和主观臆断的问题,难以对文本构成有效的解释。从现有材料来看,《二十四诗品》并未呈现出严密的体系,但一百多年来众多学者都热衷于探究其体系,其原因有客观、主观两方面。客观上看,这与近代以来的治学风气有关,“宗经”“原道”“六经注我”等文学观念以及“天人合一”、对数字敏感等文化传统亦是重要影响因素;主观上看,这背后也有着微妙的阅读心理在发挥作用,越是朦胧难解的作品,往往越能够引发人们“探秘”的兴味。
Since the Qing Dynasty, scholars have different opinions on whether the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry has a system. Among them,“ Zhou Yi system theory” is the most representative one. All kinds of “Zhou Yi system theory” focus on the overall structure, or on the order of each items, or both, but there are logical errors and subjective assumptions, which make it difficult to interpret the text effectively. Judging from the existing materials, the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry does not show a rigorous system, why there are many scholars keen to explore its system for more than a hundred years? Objectively speaking, on one hand, it is related to the academic atmosphere of the times. Since modern times, the introduction of western natural science technology and literary criticism theory, and the infiltration of ideology into the field of literary research have exerted an influence on people’s way of thinking and research methods. On the other hand, ancient literary concepts such as “Modeling on the classics”, “Tracing the origin to the Dao” and “Six classics annotate me”, as well as cultural traditions such as “Harmony between man and nature” and sensitivity to numbers, are also important influencing factors. Subjectively,there is a subtle reading psychology plays a role behind it. The more obscure and difficult the works are, the more likely they would arise people’s interest in “exploring secrets”.
出处
《海峡人文学刊》
2022年第1期42-49,67,156,157,共11页
Journal of Humanities Across the Straits
