摘要
证券纠纷示范判决机制是高效解决群体性证券纠纷的重要方式,京沪深三地法院为该机制在我国落地生根进行了有益探索。然而,证券纠纷示范判决机制在运行中存在程序启动主体单一化、平行案件当事人权益保护不周延、示范案件诉讼费用承担不合理、证券纠纷示范判决机制与证券纠纷代表人诉讼机制的关系不明确等问题。有必要从遵循本土化构建的基本理念、发挥投资者保护机构支持诉讼的作用、加强对平行案件当事人的程序保障、优化示范案件的费用承担方式、合理定位证券纠纷示范判决机制与证券纠纷代表人诉讼机制的关系等方面着手,改良证券纠纷示范判决机制,有效化解群体性证券纠纷。
The demonstrative judgment mechanism of securities disputes is an important way to solve group securities disputes efficiently.The courts in Beijing,Shanghai and Shenzhen have made beneficial exploration for this mechanism to take root in China.However,there are still some problems in the operation of the demonstrative judgment mechanism of securities disputes,such as the singleness of the starting subject of the procedure,the incomplete protection of the rights and interests of the parties in parallel cases,the unreasonable burden of the litigation costs of demonstrative cases,and the unclear relationship between the demonstrative judgment mechanism of securities disputes and the representative action mechanism of securities disputes.It is necessary to follow the basic idea to construct the localization,exerting the role of investor protection agency support litigation,to strengthen the application of parallel litigant security,optimization of demonstration cases the cost of reasonable positioning securities disputes way,demonstration and decision mechanism of securities disputes the aspects such as the relation of representative lawsuit mechanism so as to improve the securities disputes demonstration decision mechanism and effectively resolve group securities disputes.
出处
《湖南广播电视大学学报》
2021年第2期75-83,共9页
Journal of Hunan Radio and Television University
基金
国家社科基金国家应急管理体系建设研究专项“突发公共卫生事件中涉疫矛盾纠纷的防范与化解研究”(20VYJ043)
湘潭大学法学院·知识产权学院2020年研究生科研创新项目“证券纠纷示范判决机制研究”。
关键词
群体性证券纠纷
示范判决机制
示范判决效力
group securities disputes
model judgment mechanism
effect of model judgment
