摘要
近年来,广义论证视域下的中国古代逻辑史研究成为学界关注的热点,在丰硕的研究成果中,仍存在“怎样深化”与“如何拓展”等问题。在广义论证视域下对朱熹论辩逻辑体系进行考察,一方面可以打破以往研究主要集中在先秦时期的囿限,进一步拓展其研究范围;另一方面也可以在逻辑体系的构建中深化中国古代逻辑研究。从广义论证角度看,朱熹的逻辑是“名义界分”“知言穷理”等说理论证规则的集合,基于上述逻辑,朱熹同陆九渊、张栻等人围绕“太极”“仁说”等进行论辩实践,逐步建立起以名、辞理论为基础的“名、辞–辩”的逻辑体系。上述体系对后世影响深远。从广义论证角度考察朱熹论辩逻辑体系,对新时期回应如何做“中国古代逻辑”具有启发意义。
In recent years,the study of ancient Chinese logic history from the perspective of Generalized Argumentation has become a hot topic in academic circles.In the fruitful research results,“how to deepen”and“how to expand”still exist.On the one hand,it can break the limitations of previous studies,which are mainly concentrated in the preQin period,and further expand its research scope;on the other hand,it can deepen the research of ancient Chinese logic in the construction of logical system.From the perspective of Generalized Argumentation,Zhu Xi’s logic is a collection of argumentation rules,such as“nominal boundary division”,“knowing words and poor reasoning”.Based on the above logic,Zhu Xi,Lu Jiuyuan,Zhang Shi and other people carried out argumentation practice around“Taiji”and“Benevolence Theory”,and gradually constructed the Argumentation Logic System of“name,speech and argumentation”.Zhu Xi’s Argumentation Logic System has a profound influence on later generations,and it also has an enlightening significance on how to respond to“ancient Chinese logic”in the new era.
出处
《逻辑学研究》
CSSCI
2021年第2期88-104,共17页
Studies in Logic
基金
国家社科基金重大项目(14ZDB013)
中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助项目(63202056)、
贵州省2019年度哲学社会科学规划国学单列课题(19GZGX31)阶段性成果。
