摘要
首先,从自然语言论证的语境敏感性和论证的文化相对性入手,提出基于经验数据的社会文化解释方法,阐明在变动的语境下采用该方法考察论证的必要性。其次,将广义论证重新定义为:社会文化群体中依据社会规范开展的基于语篇的具有说理功能的社会互动;其外延覆盖包括形式论证在内的不同文化的论证方式。再次,从论证者所属社会文化群体规范的角度解释论证规则,描述广义论证的基本结构。最后,在本土原则和语境原则的基础上,提出获取不同社会文化群体的论证规则和结构的广义论证研究程序,并界定其使用的条件和范围。由此,本文阐明了广义论证理论及其研究方法。
This paper proposes a social and cultural interpretation method based on empirical data, and tries to establish a generalized argumentation theory that embraces multiculturalism and context sensitivity. First of all, starting with the context sensitivity of the natural language argument and the cultural relativity of the argumentation, this paper clarifies the necessity of investigating the argument through social and cultural interpretation in a changing context. Secondly, starting from the above approach, the generalized argument is redefined as discourse-based social interaction in social and cultural groups based on social norms. This paper will clarify its connotation and extension. Thirdly, it explains the rules of argumentation and describes the structure of argumentation from the perspective of the norms of the social and cultural groups to which the members belongs.Finally, on the basis of local principles and contextual principles, a general argumentation research method that can describe the argumentation rules and structures of different social and cultural groups is proposed, and the conditions and scope of their use are defined.
作者
鞠实儿
Shier Ju(Institute of Logic and Cognition,Sun Yat-sen University;Department of Philosophy,Sun Yat-sen University)
出处
《逻辑学研究》
CSSCI
2020年第1期1-27,共27页
Studies in Logic
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“基于符号化学习的推理系统研究”(18JJD720005)。
