期刊文献+

基于文献计量的天文学科发展态势分析 被引量:2

Analysis on Development Trend of Astronomy based on Bibliometrics
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于2014—2019年天文学领域发表的8.2万篇论文进行文献计量,从产出规模、学科布局、学术影响等角度分析我国天文学科的发展现状。从论文产出规模看,我国天文学科以第一作者统计全球排名第二位;在过去5年论文量增幅远高于世界平均水平。从学科布局看,我国在太阳物理领域学术产出比较活跃;星系宇宙学、恒星银河系科学产出稳定增长;太阳系与系外行星系统领域虽产出增长较快,但仍落后于其他领域。从学术影响角度看,我国天文学者仍没有第一作者产出1‰高引用论文;1%高引用论文近年来有较大增长,显示中国天文学者开始在国际舞台崭露头角。从第一作者国家看,我国学者国际合作程度较低;论文篇均被引用次数和零引用情况表现不佳。从学科指数与影响力指数看,我国的学科指数和影响力指数在论文量Top20国家均为最低,与我国天文学体量太小不无关系,我国天文学发展尚待努力。 Based on the bibliometric analysis of 82 thousand papers in the field of astronomy from 2014 to 2019, this paper analyzes the current development status of astronomy in China from the perspectives of output scale, discipline layout and academic influence. In terms of the scale of paper output, China ranks second in the world regarding the number of the first author. In the past five years, the increase in the number of papers is much higher than the world average. From the perspective of discipline layout, China?s academic output in the field of solar physics is relatively active. The scientific output in the field of galaxy and cosmology, stellar and Milky Way has increased steadily. Although the output in the field of solar system and extrasolar system is growing rapidly, it still lags behind when comparing to other fields. From the perspective of academic influence, Chinese astronomers are still not first authors to produce 1 ‰ highly cited papers, and 1% highly cited papers have increased greatly in recent years, indicating that Chinese astronomers have begun to emerge on the international stage. From the perspective of the first author?s country, the international cooperation level of Chinese scholars is relatively low, and the number of citations per article and zero citations rate performs poorly. From the perspective of subject index and influence index, China?s subject index and influence index are the lowest in the top 20 countries, which has something to do with the small volume of astronomy community in China, and great efforts are needed for the development of astronomy in China.
作者 魏韧 郭世杰 樊潇潇 董璐 李宜展 李泽霞 WEI Ren;GUO Shijie;FAN Xiaoxiao;DONG Lu;LI Yizhan;LI Zexia(National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Department of Library,Information and Archives Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Bejing 101407,China;Bureau of Facility Support and Budget,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100864,China)
出处 《世界科技研究与发展》 CSCD 2021年第2期216-227,共12页 World Sci-Tech R&D
基金 2020年中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项“科技领域战略情报研究咨询体系建设”(E0290001)。
关键词 文献计量 发展态势 学科评价 天文学 Bibliometrics Development Trend Subject Evaluation Astronomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1周建中,李晓轩.国外科研资助机构的学科评估及其启示[J].科研管理,2005,26(5):121-126. 被引量:28
  • 2邱均平,赵蓉英,马瑞敏,牛培源,程妮,李爱群.世界一流大学及学科竞争力评价的意义、理念与实践[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(5):138-142. 被引量:41
  • 3Research School of Social Sciences of Australian National University.Quantitative indicators for research assessment A literature Review.[2006-11-20].http://repp.anu.edu.au/projects.Php.
  • 4五部委联合印发《关于改进科学技术评价工作的决定》[2006-10-26].http://www.chst.cn/kjz/index/kjwj/6.htm.
  • 5OECD.The Evaluation of Scientific Research:Selected Experiences.Paris:OECD,1997:5-10,16-24,51-58,78-82.
  • 6Noyons E C M,Moed H F.Combining mapping and citation analysis for evalaativebibliometric purposes:A bibliometric study.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1999,50(2):115-131.
  • 7[2006-11-20].http://portal.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi?DestApp=ESI&Func=Frame.
  • 8Noyons E C M,Buter R K,Van Raan A F J.Mapping the field of neurosciences.[2006-10-26].http://www.cwts.n1/ed/ns2/ns0.html.
  • 9中国科学院义献情报中心.中国科学计量指标:论文与引文统计(1999年卷).北京:中国科学院文献情报中心,1999:Ⅲ-Ⅶ.
  • 10中国科学技术信息研究所.中国科技论文统计与分析(2003年度研究报告).北京:科学技术文献血版社,2005:13-24.

共引文献64

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部