摘要
对《中国文献编目规则(第二版)》与《资源描述与检索》(RDA)中译本及其最新测试版工具套件(Beta RDA Toolkit)中有关“多部分资源”的概念、关系描述、著录方式选择、信息源选取、文献类型描述、载体形态描述、作品检索点7个方面的内容展开对比分析,发现《中国文献编目规则(第二版)》有关“多部分资源”的条文存在不足,RDA的规则更加宽松有效,中文编目可加以借鉴。参考文献26。
By comparing the multi-part resources clauses between Chinese Cataloging Rules(2nd edition)and Resource Description and Access(RDA)in 7 aspects of definitions,relationships,description methods,cataloging information sources,types identification,carriers and authorized access points of works,it has been found that there are some deficiencies in multi-part resources clause of Chinese Cataloging Rules(2nd edition),relative rule in RDA is more loose and effective,and Chinese cataloging could make some modifications with RDA as a reference in the future.26 refs.
出处
《国家图书馆学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期70-76,共7页
Journal of The National Library of China
基金
2019年度秦皇岛市市级科技计划自筹经费项目“《中国文献编目规则》与RDA多部分资源的比较”(项目编号:201902A255)的研究成果之一。
