摘要
[目的/意义]深入探讨学术图书补充计量指标的学科差异性,对把握学术图书的科学学特征有重要价值,为分学科学术评价提供参考,有助于完善学术图书影响力评价方法,丰富学术评价体系。[方法/过程]采集了2009-2018年Springer平台32个学科100139本图书的被引次数、在线提及、读者数、评论数和下载量5个指标的数据,对图书已出版2年、5年、10年的不同时间窗口数据做排序-频度拟合,得到各学科不同指标的负指数或负幂分布模型,从而分析不同学科学术图书的Bookmetrix指标数值特征和动态变化规律,并对指标的相关性做了分析。[结果/结论]研究发现,理学类、人文类图书更体现经典性,而医学类、工学类、社科类图书更注重及时性;10年内图书出版时间越长,Bookmetrix指标相对差异越大,且评论数的相对差异较其他指标更大;医学类、工学类图书Bookmetrix指标相对差异较小,而人文类、社科类、理学类则较大;指标间相关性亦呈现学科差异。
[Purpose/Significance]It is of great value to explore the disciplinary differences of academic books'altmetrics indicators,which can provide theoretical basis for academic evaluation by discipline,so as to improve the evaluation of academic book impact and enrich the academic evaluation system.[Method/Process]This article uses Springer's bookmetrix index data of 100139 books in 32 disciplines from 2009 to 2018 for rank-frequency fitting,so as to analyze the numerical characteristics and dynamic change rules of bookmetrix index of academic books in different disciplines.Moreover,it analyzes the correlation of indicators.[Result/Conclusion]The study finds that science and humanities books are more classic,while medical,engineering and social science books pay more attention to timeliness.The longer the book is published within 10 years,the greater the relative difference in Bookmetrix indicators and the relative difference of reviews is larger than other indicators.The relative difference of Bookmetrix indexes of medical and engineering books is relatively small,while that of humanities,social science and science is larger.Correlation between indicators present subject differences.
作者
姜春林
郭琪琴
张光耀
Jiang Chunlin;Guo Qiqin;Zhang Guangyao(WISE Lab,Institute of Science of Science and S&T Management,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116085)
出处
《情报杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第8期193-202,共10页
Journal of Intelligence
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“融合多维信息计量指标的人文社会科学代表性学术专著评价方法与实现机制研究”(编号:18BTQ078)阶段性成果。
