期刊文献+

词频、语义和语言水平对英语搭配加工的影响 被引量:15

Effects of lexical frequency,semantic congruency,and language proficiency on English collocational processing by Chinese EFL learners
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究采用在线可接受性判断任务对比中国EFL学生与英语本族语者搭配加工中词汇频率(节点词频、搭配词频和搭配频率)、语义一致以及语言水平等的影响。结果采用R混合效应模型进行分析。研究发现:1)英语本族语者和中国学习者均在双语同译搭配判断上准确率更高,但反应速度不比对异译搭配的判断更快;2)中国学生的语言水平调节着单词词频和搭配频率对搭配判断的反应速度和时间;3)词汇频率对同译程度不一的搭配判断都起着调节作用。依据研究结果,作者提出二语搭配从规则分析到整体表征的连续统观,并指出语义透明性是考量搭配加工的另一重要变量。 The present study investigated the effects of lexical frequency(node frequency,collocate frequency,and collocational frequency),semantic congruency,and language proficiency during the online acceptability judgement task of English collocations by both native speakers of English(NSs)and Chinese EFL learners(NNSs).All the data was analyzed using R mixed-effects model.Results showed that:1)both NSs and NNSs processed more accurately same-translated collocations but not faster than judging different-translated collocations;2)NNSs’language proficiency modulated the effects of constituent word frequency and collocational frequency on the processing output;and 3)lexical frequency played a modulating role in the processing of all types of collocations for both NSs and NNSs.A tentative continuum model from rule-based to holistic processing has been put forth,and the issue of semantic transparency has been raised for future collocational research.
作者 张萍 方南 ZHANG Ping;FANG Nan(School of Foreign Languages,Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,China;School of Foreign Studies,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631,China)
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第4期532-545,640,共15页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 广东省社科基金项目“珠三角地区中学生英语词形习得与语义加工的影响因素研究”(GD19CYY14)的资助.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1刘绍龙.论二语词汇深度习得及发展特征——关于词义与词缀习得的实证调查[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(6):436-441. 被引量:195
  • 2张殿玉.多义名词的词义凸显与词项共现研究[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(5):328-336. 被引量:16
  • 3http ://corpus. byu. edu/coca/.
  • 4Cruse,D.2009.Lexical Semantics[M].Cambridge:CUP.
  • 5Degani,T.&N.Tokowicz.2013.Cross-language influences:Translation status affects intraword sense relatedness[J].Memory&Cognition 41:1046-1064.
  • 6Degani,T.,A.Prior&N.Tokowicz.2011.Bidirectional transfer:The effect of sharing a translation[J].Journal of Cognitive Psychology23:18-28.
  • 7Elston-Güttler,E.,S.Paulmann&A.Kotz.2005.Who’s in control?Proficiency and L1influence on L2processing[J].Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17:1593-1610.
  • 8Faust,M.,E.Ben-Artzi&N.Vardi.2012.Semantic processing in native and second language:Evidence from hemispheric differences in fine and coarse semantic coding[J].Brain&Language 123:228-233.
  • 9Forster,K.,K.Mohon&J.Hecter.2003.The mechanics of masked priming[A].In S.Kinoshita&S.Lupker(eds.).Masked Priming:State of the Art[C].New York:Psychology Press.2-21.
  • 10Hatch,E.&C.Brown.1995.Vocabulary,Semantics,and Language Education[M].Cambridge:CUP.

共引文献42

同被引文献129

引证文献15

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部