期刊文献+

DRG改革下的麻醉质量与安全思考 被引量:4

Consideration about the quality and safety of anesthesia under DRG payment reform
暂未订购
导出
摘要 2017年在深圳市试行的医疗机构按疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)收付费已正式在全国范围内推广执行,此项改革涉及到医疗服务的各个层面,包括医疗服务、医保支付、医院收入、个人补偿比例和定价体系等,对医疗机构的运行和医疗人员的诊疗服务影响巨大。麻醉与疼痛医疗作为医疗服务的重要组成部分,也将面临此次收费改革的冲击。然而,麻醉与疼痛医疗又与患者生命密切相关,如何让麻醉科在新的收付费体系下,高质高效地完成医疗服务任务需要所有麻醉人思考。 A new payment model based on diagnosis related group(DRG),which has been on a trial basis in Shenzhen since 2017,has formally implemented nationwide.The reform involves a series of aspects in medical services,including health care,medical insurance payment,revenues of hospitals,personal compensation proportion and pricing system,which has a huge impact on the operation of medical institution and the diagnosis and treatment services of medical personnel.Anesthesia and pain services,as an important part of medical services,are bound to face the impact of this reform.However,anesthesia and pain services are closely related to the lives of patients,thus how to make the department of anesthesiology complete the medical service tasks with high quality and efficiency under the new charging model requires the consideration of all anesthesiologists.
作者 何浩 武宙阳 陈向东 HE Hao;WU Zhouyang;CHEN Xiangdong(Department of Anesthesiology,Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China)
出处 《麻醉安全与质控》 2020年第4期202-205,共4页 Perioperative Safety and Quality Assurance
关键词 DRG 麻醉 质量 安全 diagnosis related group anesthesia quality security
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1新华网.授权发布:中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定[EB/OL].http://news.xin-huanet.com/politics/2013-11/15/c_118164235.htm.
  • 2简伟研,崔涛,王洪源,胡牧,黄因敏,张修梅,郭岩.诊断相关组死亡风险分级在医疗质量评估中的应用[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2007,39(2):145-148. 被引量:57
  • 3Goldfield N. The evolution of diagnosis-related groups(DRGs):from its beginnings in ease-mix and resouree use theory, to its implementation for payment and now for its current utilization for quality within and outside the hospital[J]. Quality Management in Health Care, 2010,19(1):3-16.
  • 4Hickie J. Clinical repmsentation in the development of case mix: measures and applications in Australia[J]. The Medical Journal of Australia, 1994(161):6-8.
  • 5BauerM,OsiennannH.DRGs in transfusion medicine and hemothempy in Cermany[J],Ttansfusian medicine and hemotherapy ,201229(2 ):60-66.
  • 6Hamada Himnori, Sekimoto Miha, [manaka Yuichi. Effects of the per diem prospective payment system with DRG-llke grouping system (DPC/PDPS) on resource usage and heahhcare quality in Japan[J]. Health Policy, 2012,107(2):194-201.
  • 7Kwon S.Payment system reform for health care provideas in Korea[J]. Health Policy Plan. 2003,18(1):84-92.
  • 8新华网.北京市2010-2011年深化医药卫生体制改革实施方案[EB/OL].[2010-06-13].http://www.bj.xinhuaneccorn/bjpd_bjzq/2010_06/13/content_20069660.htn.
  • 9Jian W, Huang Y, Hu M, et al. Performance evaluation of inpa- tient service in Beijing: a horizontal comparison with risk ad- justment based on Diagnosis Related Groups[J].BMC Health Serv Res, 2009(9): 72.
  • 10Fetter RB,Shin Y,Freeman JL,et al. Case mix definition by di- agnosis-related groups[J]. Medical Care, 1980, 18(2) : 1-53.

共引文献59

同被引文献58

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部