期刊文献+

框架语义学视角下2019年度网络流行语语义研究

A Cognitive Approach to the Semantics of Chinese Network Catchwords in 2019 from Frame Semantics
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 网络语言作为当今信息社会交流的重要媒介,语义生成具有其自身特点。本文发现在中心概念框架基础上,2019年流行语的语义形成主要通过单次认知转喻,以及直描和隐喻方式,少量通过隐转喻的方式形成,其中复杂隐喻和转喻缺失。单次转喻和隐喻的方式平衡了语言的象似性和经济性,也保留网络流行语的生动别致以及诙谐幽默。直描的方式象似性最强,语义最透明,但是语言的经济性缺失,甚至显得累赘。此外,中心概念的框架知识结构在网络流行语的生成和理解过程中起着至关重要的作用。 As a key medium to communicate in the information era,network language is generated with its unique features.In the study,it has been found that most network representations in 2019,on the basis of frame the key concept,were generated by simple metonymy and metaphor with only a few of them by metaphtonymy.Direct description also played an important role in forming those catchwords.However,the complex metaphors and metonymies were missing during the process.The simple metaphor and simple metonymy balanced the iconicity and economy of catchwords and retained such features of catchwords as vividness and humor.While the direct description rendered the most transparent meaning and iconicity but lost economy of language.Besides,without the knowledge of the key frame,readers are easy to be confused or misunderstood by those catchwords.
作者 刘康 Liu Kang(English Language Department,Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Changsha 410208,China)
出处 《和田师范专科学校学报》 2020年第1期106-110,共5页 Journal of Hotan Normal College
关键词 框架语义 网络流行语 认知研究 frame semantics network catchwords cognitive study semantic study
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1邓文彬.网络语言的定位与规范问题[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,30(1):273-277. 被引量:34
  • 2邢福义.现代汉语语法研究的“小三角”和“三平面”[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),1994,33(2):97-103. 被引量:27
  • 3王治河.作为一种生活方式的后现代主义[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,43(3):17-24. 被引量:25
  • 4徐密娥,李炯英.国内英语词汇教学研究:回顾和前瞻[J].外语界,2007(3):69-74. 被引量:90
  • 5Barcelona, A. On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor [ A]. In Barcelona [ ed. ]. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective [ C ]. Berlin : Mouton de Gnlyter, 2000.
  • 6Croft, W. The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Meta- phors and Metonymies [J~. Cognitive Linguistics, 1993 (4).
  • 7Evans, V. & M. Green. Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduc- tion [ M ]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
  • 8Dirven, R. & R. Porings. Metaphor and Metonymy in Compari- son and Contrast[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002.
  • 9Goossen, L. Metaphornymy. The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistics [ J ]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1990 ( 3 ).
  • 10Grady, J. A Typology of Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor: Correlation vs. Resemblance [ A 1. In R.W. Gibbs and G. Steen (eds.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics [ C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999.

共引文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部