期刊文献+

经锥光束乳腺CT引导下穿刺不同体模模拟乳腺肿物活检的可行性 被引量:7

Feasibility of cone-beam breast CT-guided puncture of different phantoms simulating biopsy of breast tumor
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的对比分析不同体模模拟经锥光束乳腺CT(CBBCT)引导下乳腺肿物穿刺活检的可行性。方法在CBBCT引导下分别对不同体模(硅胶乳腺、煮熟土豆、圆形茄子和芒果)深浅部位的靶目标(腊肠块模拟肿瘤)进行穿刺活检,统计其准确率及成本。结果同一体模深部与浅部穿刺准确率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。硅胶乳腺穿刺准确率为92.50%(37/40),土豆为81.25%(78/96),茄子为72.92%(70/96),芒果为61.54%(32/52)。结论CBBCT引导下体模穿刺活检的准确率较高,以煮熟土豆性价比最高。 Objective To observe the feasibility of cone-beam breast CT(CBBCT)-guided puncture of different phantoms simulating biopsy of breast tumor.Methods Under the guidance of CBBCT,the superficial and deep targets(dachshund)of different phantoms(silicone breast,boiled potato,round eggplant,mango)were punctured and biopsied,respectively.The accuracy and cost of different phantoms were calculated.Results The accuracy of deep and shallow location of the same phantom was not significantly different(all P>0.05).The accuracy of silicone breast,boiled potato,round eggplant and mango was 92.50%(37/40),81.25%(78/96),72.92%(70/96)and 61.54%(32/52),respectively.Conclusion The accuracy of CBBCT-guided puncture of different phantoms simulating biopsy of breast tumor was high.Boiled potato was the most cost-effective phantom.
作者 康巍 赵欣 刘宇 郑仲涛 蒙丽宇 钟武宁 苏丹柯 KANG Wei;ZHAO Xin;LIU Yu;ZHENG Zhongtao;MENG Liyu;ZHONG Wuning;SU Danke(Department of Radiology,Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital,Nanning 530021,China;Department of the Fifth Chemotherapy,Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital,Nanning 530021,China)
出处 《中国介入影像与治疗学》 北大核心 2020年第4期238-242,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0112600、2017YFC0112603)。
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 活组织检查 细针 锥束计算机体层摄影术 体模 breast neoplasms biopsy fine-needle cone-beam computed tomography phantom
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献36

  • 1龚柳燕,刘凤梅,佘响云.X线立体定位活检在乳腺钙化中的临床应用[J].实用放射学杂志,2004,20(9):831-833. 被引量:10
  • 2孟娴,王刚,雷亿成,林玉萍.乳腺X线立体定位穿刺活检术对早期乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2005,2(5):381-383. 被引量:2
  • 3Wiratkapun C, Bunyapaiboonsri W, Wibulpolprasert B, et at. Biopsy rate and positive predictive value for breast cancer in BIRADS category 4 breast lesions. Med Assoc Thai, 2010, 93(7) : 830-837.
  • 4Bent CK, Bassett LW, ITOrsi CJ, et al. The positive predictive value of B1-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentqenol, 2010, 194(5):12785 -1283.
  • 5Groenendijk RP, Ter Horst H, Tinnemans JG, et al. Critical analysis of the treatment of non palpable breast cancer: toward a less invasive future? World J Surg, 2002,26(3) :285-289.
  • 6Riedl CC, PfarI G, Memarsadeqhi M, et al. Lesion miss rates and false-negative rates for 1115 consecutive cases of stereotactically guided needleqocalized open breast biopsy with long-term follow2 up. Radiology, 2005,237(3):847-853.
  • 7Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Pijnappel RM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of needle-localized open breast biopsy for impalpable breast disease. Br J Surq, 2000,87(3) :344-347.
  • 8Ruamsup S, Wiratkapun C, Wibulpolprasert B, et al. A comparison between short-interval and regulapinterval follow-up for BIRADS category 3 lesions. Singapore Med J, 2010, 51 (2): 120- 125.
  • 9Vizeaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, et al. Short-term follow-up resuits in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology, 2001,219(2) :475-483.
  • 10顾雅佳,肖勤.乳腺X线报告规范化——BI-RADS介绍[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2007,13(5):322-326. 被引量:51

共引文献63

同被引文献53

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部