期刊文献+

985例早孕期线毛活检样本的遗传学结果分析 被引量:8

First-trimester chorionic villus sampling:genetic analysis of 985 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨早孕期绒毛活检(chorionic villus sampling,CVS)术在产前诊断中的应用价值及安全性。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月在北京大学第一医院妇产科行CVS术取材,并通过染色体核型分析和荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)进行产前诊断的985例的病历资料,对细胞培养成功率、产前诊断指征、细胞遗传学诊断结果和CVS手术并发症等进行描述性分析。结果985例中,970例(98.48%)行FISH检测,893例(90.66%)进行了染色体核型分析,878例(89.14%)同时行核型分析与FISH检测。CVS术取材后,细胞培养成功率为96.64%(863/893)。超声异常是最常见的产前诊断指征,占42.64%(420/985)。本研究共检出各类染色体异常181例,检出率为18.38%(181/985)。其中,超声异常为指征的检出率最高,为31.90%(134/420),其次为不良孕产史[11.83%(20/169)]和高龄[8.21%(11/134)]。此外,有16例可能因胎盘嵌合和13例可能因母体污染而引起的FISH检测与核型分析结果不符的病例。CVS术后4周内,6例(0.61%,6/985)孕妇发生胎停育(其中4例存在染色体数目异常);其余979例(99.39%)未见近、远期手术并发症。结论早孕期CVS术是一种安全可靠的介入性诊断方式,对于早孕期超声异常等特定指征人群可以更早获得产前诊断结果,增强产前诊断的针对性,提高效率,但也不可忽视胎盘嵌合和母体污染对诊断结果可能造成的影响。 Objective To investigate the value and safety of first-trimester chorionic villus sampling(CVS)in prenatal diagnosis.Methods This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 985 cases undergoing CVS and prenatal diagnosis with karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH)in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Peking University First Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017.The success rate of cell culture,indications for prenatal diagnosis,karyotyping results,and complications of CVS were described.Results Among the 985 cases,970(98.48%)underwent FISH and 893(90.66%)received karyotyping,and 878(89.14%)accepted both.After CVS,the success rate of cell culture was 96.64%(863/893).Abnormal ultrasonographic findings(42.64%,420/985)were the most common indications for prenatal diagnosis.In this study,181 cases of chromosomal abnormalities were detected,including numerical and structural abnormalities,accounting for 18.38%of all 985 cases.Those cases with abnormal ultrasonographic images had the highest detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities(31.90%,134/420),followed by those with adverse pregnant history(11.83%,20/169)and advanced maternal age(8.21%,11/134).In addition,there was a discrepancy between karyotyping and FISH results,which might due to 16 cases of placental mosaicism and 13 cases of maternal cell contamination(MCC).Embryonic demises were reported in six cases(0.61%,6/985),including four with chromosomal numerical abnormalities within four weeks after CVS.No other short-or long-term postoperative complications were found in the rest 979 cases(99.39%).Conclusions CVS in the first trimester is a safe and reliable invasive method for prenatal diagnosis,which can help to obtain an earlier diagnosis in a certain population such as those with abnormal ultrasonographic findings,thus improve the pertinence and efficiency of prenatal diagnosis.However,the potential influences of placental mosaicism and MCC on the diagnostic results should not be ignored.
作者 佟玉龙 潘虹 卫凯平 付杰 于丽 杨慧霞 Tong Yulong;Pan Hong;Wei Kaiping;Fu Jie;Yu Li;Yang Huixia(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China;Department of Central Laboratory,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China)
出处 《中华围产医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期2-7,共6页 Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
关键词 绒毛膜绒毛取样 产前诊断 染色体畸变 妊娠初期 Chorionic villi sampling Prenatal diagnosis Chromosome aberrations Pregnancy trimester,first
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献103

  • 1丁华新,杨晓苏,肖波,吴志国,张丽芳.脊髓性肌萎缩症SMN基因拷贝数定量分析[J].中华医学遗传学杂志,2004,21(2):153-155. 被引量:8
  • 2戚庆炜,向阳,黄尚志,边旭明,郝娜,吕珂,超声诊断科,谭莉,张为民,周京,孙念怙.早孕期经腹绒毛取材在产前诊断中的应用[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(9):620-621. 被引量:11
  • 3申本昌,张成,孙筱放,张慧敏,李少英.Duchenne肌营养不良症患者及携带者的基因缺失和重复突变检测[J].中华医学遗传学杂志,2007,24(4):460-463. 被引量:2
  • 4陆国辉 陈天健 黄尚志 等.产前诊断及其在国内应用的分析.中国优生与遗传杂志,2003,11(1):1-5.
  • 5Welch RA, Salem-EIgharib S,Wiktor AE, et al. Operatorexperience and sample quality in genetic amniocentesis. Am JObstet Gynecol, 2006, 194: 189-191.
  • 6Stojilkovic-Mikic T,Mann K, Docherty Z, et al. Maternal cellcontamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCRgenotyping. Prenat Diagn, 2005 , 25:79-83.
  • 7Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Xiang Y,et al. Prenatal diagnosis byfluorescence in situ hybridization on chorionic villus cells:nonsignificance of maternal cell contamination. Fetal Diagn Ther,1994, 9:73-76.
  • 8Schrijver I,Cherny SC,Zehnder JL. Testing for maternal cellcontamination in prenatal samples : a comprehensive survey ofcurrent diagnostic practices in 35 molecular diagnosticlaboratories. J Mol Diagn, 2007,9:394400.
  • 9Winsor EJ, Akoury H, Chitayat D, et al. The role of molecularmicrosatellite identity testing to detect sampling errors in prenataldiagnosis. Prenat Diagn, 2010,30:746-752.
  • 10Nagan N, Faulkner NE, Curtis C, et al. MCC GuidelinesWorking Group of the Association for Molecular Pathology ( AMP)Clinical Practice Committee. Laboratory guidelines for detection,interpretation, and reporting of maternal cell contamination inprenatal analyses a report of the association for molecularpathology. J Mol Diagn, 2011,13:7-11.

共引文献366

同被引文献81

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部