期刊文献+

2020年美国总统竞选与美国气候政策探析 被引量:1

The 2020 U.S. Presidential Campaign and American Climate Policy
原文传递
导出
摘要 府会双层博弈中的掣肘关系,导致美国在全球气候治理实践中处于被动局面。随着两党在气候立场上的极化特征凸显,民主党居主导的府会结构有利于美国气候政策的正向演化。2020年美国总统竞选与国会中期选举的结果,关系到其气候政策演化能否出现新一轮的积极跃升。关键摇摆州的国会议员提出的进入立法程序的法案,对总统候选人的政策偏好影响重大,且会进一步影响当选总统的施政纲领。鉴于此,在把握20世纪50年代以来气候议题府会融洽度变迁的基础上,探析上届总统参选以来弗洛里达和宾夕法尼亚两个关键摇摆州议员的气候提案,可以为洞察下一步演化趋势提供参考。 Ratification between the legislative-executive interactions in two-level gaming has placed the U.S.government in a passive position in global climate governance.Despite the polarization between Republican and Democratic Parties on this agenda,the Democrats dominate the positive evolution of climate policies.The result of the coming 2020 Presidential campaign and mid-term elections will play a significant role in the development of cilmate policy legislation.The bills submitted by the key swing states will crucially influence policy preferences of presidential candidates and their future policy agenda.Therefore,by reviewing bipartisan and legislative-exective interactions since the 1950 s and by focusing the two key swing states of Florida and Pennsylvania since 2016,this paper seeks to provide insights for future U.S.climate policy evolution.
作者 郦莉 刘哲 Li Li;Liu Zhe
出处 《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期54-63,共10页 Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
基金 北京市哲学社会科学基金青年项目(18ZGC009) 国家社会科学基金重大研究专项项目(18VZT001)
关键词 美国府会关系 双层博弈 总统选举 摇摆州 气候治理 U.S.Legislative-exective Interactions Two-level Game Theory Presidential Campaign Swing States Climate Governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1秦亚青.层次分析法与国际关系研究[J].欧洲研究,1998,19(3):4-10. 被引量:67
  • 2楼庆红.美国环境外交的三个发展阶段[J].社会科学,1997(10):28-30. 被引量:14
  • 3罗伯特·D.普特南.《外交和国内政治:双层次博弈的逻辑》[J].国际组织,1988,.
  • 4Robert O. Keohane, "Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond", in Robert O. Keohane, ed., Neo-Realism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, p 165.
  • 5例如,现实主义国际关系理论大师摩根索就指出:“国民性和国民士气特别难于合理地预测,而且它们对一国能在国际政治中起多大的作用尤其是具有持久性的,往往是决定性的影响.”参见《国际纵横策论——争强权,求和平》,上海译文出版社1995年版,第174页.华尔兹在对战争根源的三层次的探讨中,其中一个层次就试图考察国家的政治、经济和社会构成.参见《人,国家与战争——一种理论的分析》,倪世雄等译,上海译文出版社,1991年.国际政治经济的研究领域也运用了结合国内因素和国际关系理论的方法.自由主义的相互依赖理论也往往把国内因素作为发挥重要作用的“剩余变量”.
  • 6Andrew Moravcsik, "Introduction: Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining", in Peter B. Evans, Harold K. Jacobson, Robert D. Putnam ed., Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, California: University of California Press, 1993,pp.8-9.
  • 7James Rosenau, "Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy", in Barry Farrel (ed.) Approaches to Comparative and International Politics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1966, pp. 29-92.
  • 8Charles Hermann, "Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy", International Studies Quarterly, 1990, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 3-21.
  • 9James Rosenau, "Toward the Study of National-International Linkage", in James Rosenau ed., Linkage Politics: Essays on the Convergence of National and International Systems, New York: Free Press, 1969, pp.44-63.
  • 10Barry Buzan, "The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations Reconsidered," in Ken Booth and Steve Smith, International Relations Theory Today, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995,pp.213-214.

共引文献26

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部