期刊文献+

体制与能力:试析美国气候外交的二元影响因素 被引量:2

An Analysis of the Dualistic Effects of Institutions and Power on U.S.Climate Diplomacy
原文传递
导出
摘要 在推动全球气候变化治理的进程中,美国政府遭遇了体制与能力的二元困境:既要平衡体制内部的矛盾,融合地方和党派的分歧,达成政治妥协;又要提高谈判能力,以主导气候变化谈判机制建设,垄断话语权和发展空间分配权。因此,在全球气候变化治理中出现了一种矛盾现象:一方面,美国在全球治理谈判进程中拥有强大的谈判能力;另一方面,由美国的体制衍生而来的分化消极态度极大约束了其在气候外交和全球谈判的手脚。本文试图从美国的体制和能力两个维度来分析这一现象,认为美国强大的谈判能力和日趋分化的决策体制之间的失衡将不可避免地促使其在全球气候环境治理中的领导地位不断下降。美国气候外交在不同的时期表现有所差异,不能将其简单归因于政党政治和利益集团或者执政党领袖等因素,而是美国体制问题和谈判能力二元互动的产物。 In process of promoting global climate change governance , the U.S.government is trapped between the dualities of power and institutions : on the one hand it seeks to balance internal institutional contradictions between parties and localities by arriving at a political compromise ; on the other hand it wants to increase its bargaining power so that it can guide the establishment of mechanisms for climate change talks and monopolize the development of space for dialogue.As a result , a contradiction has emerged in international climate governance : while the U.S.has strong bargaining power in the dialogue on global governance , problems rooted in American institutions have brought about a negative attitude and tie the hand of the U.S.with respect to its climate change diplomacy.This article analyzes the problem from the standpoint of U.S.institutions and power , and argues that the combination of strong bargaining power but increasingly divided decision making institutions will inevitably result in the continued erosion of the U.S.leadership position in global climate change governance talks.American climate diplomacy has exhibited very different characteristics during different periods , and it is not possible to simply dismiss this as a result of partisanship or the role of interest groups or party leadership , but is instead a product of the duality of U.S.institutional defects and its bargaining power.
作者 于宏源
出处 《当代亚太》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期113-129,159-160,共17页 Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"限容和创新:气候变化两大挑战的综合研究"(项目批准号:09BGJ008) "南北极环境综合考察与评估专项"(项目编号:CHINARE2012-04-05)的阶段性成果 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划"气候变化谈判综合问题的关键技术研究"(课题编号:2012BAC20B02)的阶段性成果
关键词 美国气候外交 体制 谈判能力 全球治理 American Climate Diplomacy Institutions Bargaining Power Global Governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献64

二级参考文献133

  • 1顾学稼.自然资源保护与西奥多·罗斯福[J].美国研究,1987,1(1):96-112. 被引量:7
  • 2楼庆红.美国环境外交的三个发展阶段[J].社会科学,1997(10):28-30. 被引量:14
  • 3滕海键.略论美国现代史上的三次环保运动[J].赤峰学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,27(1):11-13. 被引量:7
  • 4Hearing on Oil Profits and Subsidies: Solis's Questions, April 1, 20081 http: //hk. youtube. com/watch? v= mNFJk0JkHyc& feature= related.
  • 5"Exxon to Cut Funding to Climate Change Denial Groups", http: //www. guardian. co. uk/environment/2008/may/28/elimatechange. fossilfuels
  • 6张孟军.《美企业先政府一步积极减排温室气体》.《科技日报》,2005年12月5日.
  • 7PRNewswire (United Business Media), "Ceres Report Ranks DuPont # 1 in U. S. , # 2 Globally on ClimateC hange". http: //sev. prnewswire. com/chemical/20060321/PHTU01921032006-1. html
  • 8Ceres, 2008 Investor Summit on Climate Risk : Final Report, 2008. http: //www. ceres. org/NETCOMMUNITY/Document. Doc? id=831
  • 9《欧盟减排新目标雄心勃勃》.中国能源网,2007年3月13日.http://www.chirta5e.com/news/huanbao/200703/200703130134.html.
  • 102008, Climate Action and Renewable Energy Package. http: //www. europeanenergyforum. eu/archives/european-union/eu-general-topic-file/eu-environment/third-energy-package-climate-action- and-renewable-energy.

共引文献90

同被引文献68

  • 1See Nigel Purvis and Andrew Stevenson, "Rethin- king Climate Diplomacy : New Ideas for Transatlantic Cooperation Post-Copenhagen," Brussels Forum Paper Series, The German Marshall Fund of The United States, 2010.
  • 2Conference Report, " Resolving Deadlock in Climate Change Negotiations," EU-Asia Dialogue, Bonn, Germany, April 25 - 26, 2013.
  • 3Glen Sussman and Byron W. Daynes, "An Early Assessment of President George W. Bush and the Environment," in Bryan Hilliard, Tom Lansford, and Robert P. Watson, George W. Bush: Evaluating the President at Midterm ( New York : State University of New York Press, 2004 ), p. 59.
  • 4Glen Sussman, "The USA and Global Environmental Policy : Domestic Constraints on Effective Leadership," Inter- national Political Science Review, Vol. 25 ( October 2004) , pp. 349, 365.
  • 5Andrew C. Revkin, "Issuing a Bold Challenge to the U.S. over Climate," New York Times, January 22, 2008.
  • 6Matt Hoye and Holly Yan, "U. S. and China Reach Historic Climate Change Deal, Vow to Cut Emissions," CNN, November 12, 2014, available at : http ://edition. cnn. com/2014/11/12/world/us-china-climate-change-agree- ment/.
  • 7Joshua P. Meltzer, "U. S. -China Joint Presidential Statement on Climate Change: The Road to Paris and Beyond," Brookings Blogs, September 25, 2015, available at : http ://www. brookings, edu/blogs/planetpoliey/posts/2015/ 09/29 - us-china-statement -climate -change -meltzer.
  • 8Yanek Mieczkowski, Gerald Ford and the Challenges of the 1970s ( Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2005 ) , pp. 102 - 103.
  • 9Richard Nathan, "Updating Theories of Federalism," in Timothy J. Conlan and Paul L. Posner eds. , Intergovern- mental Management in the 21st Century (Washington, D. C. : Brookings Institution, 2008 ), pp. 13 25.
  • 10Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U. S. 497, 2007.

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部