期刊文献+

学龄期儿童警觉性注意发展的事件相关电位特征分析 被引量:5

Event-related potential characteristics analysis on vigilant attention development of school-age children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨6-11岁儿童警觉性注意发展的事件相关电位(event-related potential,ERP)特征。方法6~11岁学龄期儿童共144人,按年龄分组并进行持续性操作测试(continuous performance test,CPT)-AX(Go/Nogo)任务,对各年龄组儿童的行为学和额区cue/uncue-P3、CNV的潜伏期、波幅进行分析比较。结果(1)行为学比较,6岁组、7岁组、8岁组、10岁组,11岁组各年龄组正确数[35(31,38)个,37(34,38.25)个,37(34.75,39)个,38(35,39.25)个,39(37.25,40)个,39(39,40)个],正确反应时间[(566.88±86.63)ms,(530.10±83.40)ms,(509.17±8&99)ms,(488.31±76.23)ms,(463.45±75.78)ms,(417.24±75.78)ms]之间的差异均有统计学意义(£=44.512,11.155,均P<0.01);(2)Fz导联的ERP特征:①cue-CNV、uncue-CNV比较:6岁组[(-8.54±4.56)uV,(-10.13±6.36)uV],7岁组[(-9.20±5.34)uV,(-11.53±4.29)uV],8岁组[(-8.37±4.78)uV,(-11.35±6.38)uV],cue-CNV波幅均低于uncue-CNV波幅,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);9岁组[(689.25±268.22)ms,(826.13±174.62)ms],cue-CNV潜伏期较uncue-CNV潜伏期缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);②cue-P3、uncue-P3比较:6岁组[(4.29±4.11)uV,(7.45±3,83)uV],7岁组[(4.47±4,71)uV,(5.82±4.40)uV],8岁组[(3.76±3.39)uV,(6.24±4.91)uV],9岁组[(4.27±3.57)u,(5.93±3.08)uV],n岁组[(4.24±4.66)uV,(6.13±4.42)uV],cue-P3波幅均低于uncue-P3波幅,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);③各年龄组纵向比较:9岁组、11岁组cue-CNV潜伏期缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),10岁组的cue-CNV和cue-P3的波幅均较其他年龄组增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论随年龄增长,学龄期儿童CPT任务绩效逐龄提高;9~10岁儿童大脑警觉性注意认知网络和心理预测能力得到高速发展,可能与额叶皮质的成熟化发育有关。 ObjectuVe To explore the characteristics of event-related potential(ERP)in the development of alert attention of children aged 6-11 years old.Methods A total of 144 children aged 6-11 years old were enrolled in a continuous performance test(CPT,Go/Nogo stimulus task).The latency and amplitude of frontal region cue/uncue-P3 and CNV were analyzed and compared in all age groups.Results(1)Behavioral comparison among different age groups:correct number(35(31,38),37(34,38.25),37(34.75,39),38(35,39.25),39(37.25,40),39(39,40)).correct reaction time((566.88±86.63)ms,(530.10±83.40)ms,(509.17±88.99)ms,(488.31±76.23)ms,(463.45±75.78)ms,(417.24±75.78)ms),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01).(2)Fz lead ERP characteristics:(I)Comparison of cue CNV and uncue-CNV:6-year-old group((一&54±4.56)uV qs(-10.13±6.36))uV),7-year-old group((-9.20±5.34))uV vs(-11.53±4.29)uV),8-year-old group((-8.37±4.78)uV vs(-11.35±6.38)uV)in amplitude and 9-year-old group((689.25±268.22)ms vs(826.13±174.62)ms)in latency were significantly different(P<0.05).②Comparison of cue-P3 and uncue-P3:6-year-old group((4.29±4.11)uV vs(7.45±3.83)uV),7-year-old group((4.47±4.71)uV vs(5.82±4.40)uV),8-year-old group((3.76±3.39)uV vs(6.24±4.91)uV),9-year-old group((4.27±3.57)uV vs(5.93±3.08)uV),H-year-old group((4.24±4.66)uV vs(6.13±4.42)uV)in amplitude were significantly different(P<0.05).③Longitudinal comparison among age groups:the latency of cue・CNV in 9-year-old group and 11-year-old group were shorter,and the difference was significant(P<0.05).The amplitudes of cue-CNV and cue-P3 in 10-year-old group were shorter than those in other age groups(P<0.05).Conclusion With the increase of age,the reaction time of school-age children shortened and the correct rate improved.The age of 9-10 may be the high・speed period of the development for brain network on vigilant attention and psychological prediction which may be related to the maturation and development of frontal cortex.
作者 廖丽娜 易阳 王超群 赵方乔 董毓 吴婷 Liao Lina;Yi Yang;Wang Chaoqun;Zhao Fangqiao;Dong Yu;Wu Ting(Department of Neurology,Affiliated Changzhou Children's Hospital of Nantong University,Changzhou 213000,China;Department of Respiration,Affiliated Changzhou Children s Hospital of Nantong University,Changzhou 213000,China;Children s Health Research Center,Affiliated Changzhou Children Hospital of Nantong University,Changzhou 213000,China)
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第11期1005-1009,共5页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 常州市科技支撑计划(社会发展)项目(CE20185046)。
关键词 事件相关电位 学龄期儿童 警觉性注意 Event related potential School-age children Vigilant attention
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献45

  • 1杨治良.信号检测论的应用[J].心理科学通讯,1989,12(5):44-49. 被引量:8
  • 2姜淇远,赵旭,陈善广,郭华岭,陈道木,姚方尹.监视作业的工效评定与提高工效的措施[J].航天医学与医学工程,1995,8(2):146-153. 被引量:5
  • 3王苏弘,任艳玲,董选,刘冬柏.正常儿童和成人冲突监测及反应抑制能力发展的事件相关电位研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(6):535-537. 被引量:5
  • 4Funahashi S.Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex.Neurosci Res,2001,39:147-165.
  • 5Kanemura H,Aihara M,Aoki S,et al.Development of the prefrontal lobe in infants and children:a three-dimensional magnetic resonance volumetric study.Brain Dev,2003,25:195-199.
  • 6Wada N,Yamashita Y,Matsuishi T,et al.The test of attention (TOVA) is useful in the diagnosis of Japanese male children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Brain Dev,2000,6:378-382.
  • 7Bruin KJ,Wijiers AA.Inhibition,response mode,and stimulus probability:a comparative event-related potential study.Clin Neurophysiol,2002,113:1172-1182.
  • 8Bruin KJ,Wijiers AA,Staveren AS.Response priming in a Go/Nogo task:do we have to explain the Go/Nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? Clin Neurophysiol,2001,112:1660-1671.
  • 9Jodo E,Kayama Y.Relation of a negative component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol,1992,82:477-482.
  • 10Nieuwenhuis S,Yeung N,van den Wildenberg W,et al.Eeletrophysiological correlates of anterior function in a go/no-go task:effects of response conflict and trial typo frequency.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci,2003,3:17-26.

共引文献20

同被引文献18

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部