期刊文献+

获益目标回应感知量表的汉化及其信效度检验 被引量:3

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the perceived responses to capitalization attempts scale
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的翻译获益目标回应感知量表,并检验该量表在中国护士群体中的信效度。方法遵循Brislin模型对量表进行翻译,用中文版获益目标回应感知量表对南京市某三级甲等综合性医院的610名临床护士进行测试,检验其信效度,并进一步探讨其与生活满意度和积极与消极情感的关系。结果获益目标回应感知量表共12个条目,探索性因子分析产生4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为85.085%,分别为主动-建构回应、被动-建构回应、主动-破坏回应、被动-破坏回应4个维度。量表内容效度为0.94;总量表Cronbach’sα系数为0.881~0.911,重测信度为0.768~0.866。主动-建构回应与护士的生活满意度、正性情绪呈正相关(P<0.001);与负性情绪呈负相关(P<0.001)。被动-建构回应、主动-破坏回应及被动-破坏回应分别与护士的生活满意度及正性情绪呈负相关(P<0.05,P<0.001);与负性情绪呈正相关(P<0.001)。结论中文版获益目标回应感知量表具有良好的信效度,对于评价我国护士获益目标回应感知具有一定的应用价值。 Objective To translate the perceived responses to capitalization attempts scale(PRCA)into Chinese and test its reliability and validity in Chinese context.Methods The Brislin model was used to translate the scale,and 610 clinical nurses from a comprehensive hospital in Nanjing were enrolled to test the Chinese version of the scale in view of its reliability and validity.Its relationship with life satisfaction and positive and negative emotion were further studied.Results The PRCA consisted of 12 items.According to the results of exploratory factor analysis,4 factors were extracted which explained 85.085%of the total variance including active-constructive,passive-constructive,active-destructive and passive-destructive.The content validity index(S-CVI/Ave)at the average scale level was 0.94.The Cronbachxs a coefficient of the scale was 0.881-0.911 and intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC)was 0.768-0.866.Active-constructive was positively correlated with nurses'life satisfaction and positive emotions(P<0.001),and negatively correlated with negative emotions(P<0.001).The factors of passive-constructive,active-destructive and passive-destructive were negatively correlated with nurses'life satisfaction and positive emotions(P<0.05)and positively correlated with negative emotions(P<0.001).Conclusion The Chinese version of the perceived responses to capitalization attempts scale has good reliability and validity,and therefore it can be applied among Chinese nurses.
作者 蒋琦琦 刁齐翔 郭研 陈玉红 Jiang Qiqi;Diao Qixiang;Guo Yan;Chen Yuhong(The Third Clinical Medical College,Nanjing Medical University;Nursing Department,Nanjing First Hospital,Nanjing,210006,China)
出处 《现代临床护理》 2019年第10期64-70,共7页 Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词 获益目标回应感知量表 护士 信度 效度 perceived responses to capitalization attempts nurses reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献156

  • 1焦璇,陈毅文.解释心理起源的新理论范式——进化心理学[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):622-628. 被引量:16
  • 2丁秀桥.全面质量管理在护理管理中的应用[J].职业与健康,2004,20(12):191-192. 被引量:4
  • 3彭晓哲,周晓林.情绪信息与注意偏向[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(4):488-496. 被引量:126
  • 4李旺君,王利香.“品管圈”活动在护士长夜查房中的应用与效果[J].护理管理杂志,2007,7(5):55-56. 被引量:249
  • 5[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 6[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 7[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 8[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 9[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 10[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182

共引文献9029

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部