期刊文献+

循证科普:如何保证健康科普创作的科学性 被引量:10

Evidence-based Health Popularization:How to Ensure the Scientific Nature of Health Popularization Creation
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着循证医学的发展,循证思维逐渐被应用到越来越多的领域。为了提高健康科普的科学性,本文从循证思维出发,提出应用循证的理念进行健康科普创作,并在循证视角下提出当前健康科普在证据选择、评价及应用方面存在的问题:证据选择偏倚、核心观点缺乏高级别证据支持、未选用最新证据、将争议内容当做学术界共识、选用无可靠证据来源支持的专家意见、证据与文章主题或结论相关性差、文章与大众需求或健康素养不符等。为解决这些问题,在健康科普创作中,我们应当应用循证科普,合理使用检索词和数据库进行最新、有效证据的搜集,并对证据进行评价筛选,最后结合大众需求和健康素养进行证据的应用。 With the development of evidence-based medicine,evidence-based thinking has gradually been applied to more fields. In order to improve the scientific nature of health popularization,this paper proposes the use of evidence-based thinking to create health popularization,and puts forward the following scientific problems of health popularization in the selection,evaluation and application of evidence under the evidence-based perspective:bias in the choice of evidence,the lack of highconfidence-level evidence to support core views,no selection of the latest evidence,the use of controversial content as academic consensus,the selection of expert opinions that are not supported by reliable sources of evidence,the evidence of poorly related to the subject and conclusion of the article, and articles of no matching the needs of the public or health literacy. Therefore,in the creation of health popularization,the author suggested applying evidence-based health popularization,rationally use search terms and databases to collect the latest and effective evidence,evaluate and filtrate the evidence,and finally according to public demand and health literacy to use evidence.
作者 潘越 贾淑娴 陈翔梧 张诗迎 郝国祥 马青坪 宋永朝 吴一波 Pan Yue;Jia Shuxian;Chen Xiangwu;Zhang Shiying;Hao Guoxiang;Ma Qingping;Song Yongchao;Wu Yibo(Shandong University School of Pharmacy,Jinan 250012;Shandong University School of Stomatology,Jinan 250012;The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050031;Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100191)
出处 《科普研究》 2019年第5期102-107,114,共7页 Studies on Science Popularization
关键词 循证 健康 科普创作 evidence-based health popularization health popularization evidence-based medicine health popularization creation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1贾鹤鹏,范敬群.转基因何以持续争议——对相关科学传播研究的系统综述[J].科普研究,2015,10(1):83-92. 被引量:21
  • 2郭于华.天使还是魔鬼——转基因大豆在中国的社会文化考察[J].社会学研究,2005(1):84-112. 被引量:30
  • 3Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, et al.詹思延主译.唐金陵主审.循证医学实践和教学[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006:136.
  • 4周桂田.在地化风险之实践与理论缺口-迟滞型高科技风险社会.台湾社会研究季刊,2002,:69-156.
  • 5Evidence Based Medicine Working Group.Evidence based medicine.A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine [J].JAMA,1992,268:2420-2425.
  • 6Sackett DL,Rosenberg WM,Gray JA,et al.Evidence based medicine:what it is and what it isn't.1996[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2007,455:3-5.
  • 7Antman EM,Lau J,Kupelnick B,et al.A comparison of results of meta analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts.Treatments for myocardial infarction[J].JAMA,1992,268:240-248.
  • 8Oxman AD,Guyatt GH.The science of reviewing research[J].Ann N Y Acad Sci,1993,703:125-133.
  • 9Oliveri RS,Wetterslev J,Gluud C.Transarterial (chemo)embolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2011:CD004787.
  • 10Riemsma RP,Bala MM,Wolff R,et al.Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus no intervention or placebo intervention for liver metastases[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013:CD009498.

共引文献103

同被引文献56

引证文献10

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部