摘要
预期违约制度在我国合同法中仍有待深入研究。与实际违约不同,预期违约所违反的是"不危害给付实施的不作为义务",该义务不是合同义务。预期违约方所侵犯的是完全生债权效力的完备债权,而不是只取得部分权利要件的"期待权"。预期违约救济措施可以有效减少等到实际违约时所造成的损失,及时解决纠纷,从而在最大程度上避免社会资源的人为浪费。预期违约制度的建立,实质上体现了合同的内在的非伦理性与外部的伦理秩序之间的摩擦与契合。
The system of anticipatory breach of contract is still immature in our Contract Law.Different from actual breach of contract,what the party of anticipatory breach abandoned is a nonfeasance of'not en- dangering the performance of deliver',which is not a contractual obligation.It is not the'Anwar- tschaftsrecht'but the complete legal right of the contractual obligee that is infringed.The redress of anticipa- tory breach of contract can decrease the loss,and can end dispute in time.It also can avoid the man-made waste of social resource furthest.In conclusion(or in summary?),the system of anticipatory breach of cont- ract substantially reduces the inconsistency between the non-ethical characteristic of contract and the outer ethical order.
出处
《中山大学研究生学刊（社会科学版）》
2002年第2期62-68,共7页
Journal of the Graduates Sun YAT-SEN University(Social Sciences)
关键词
预期违约制度
理论基础
中国
合同法
实际违约
期待权
合同义务
非伦理性
Anticipatory Breach of Contract
Actual Breach of Contract
Anwartschaftsrecht
Contractual Obligation
the Non-Ethical Characteristic of Contract
