期刊文献+

留学生学费定价与资助政策研究 被引量:25

Tuition fee and financial aid policy to foreign students
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国对留学生的高等教育服务具有较少的公共产品属性 ,可将其确定为私人产品。成本补偿政策不是留学生学费定价政策的理论基础。应允许高等学校根据市场需求状况、自身教育质量、教育理念、地区、专业等因素 ,自主确定留学生学费并允许赢利。对留学生的高等教育服务可能产生的外部收益具有可分割性 ,据此应取消公费与自费留学生的区别 ,并将目标外部收益分割操作 ,以确定留学生资助政策。据此思路 。 China's higher education service to foreign students can be regarded as private goods because it possesses little attributes of public goods, thus its price cannot be based on the cost\|compensation policy. Institutions of higher learning should be allowed to decide the tuition fee and make profits according to market needs, its quality, educational ideas as well as regions and majors. The potential external benefits can be distributed; accordingly, the public\|private expense distinction between foreign students should be abolished. The tuition fee and financial aid to students from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan should be reconsidered.
作者 卢晓东
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第6期39-43,共5页 Journal of Higher Education
关键词 留学生 学费定价 资助政策 高等教育 成本补偿理论 市场定价 香港 澳门 台湾省 foreign students tuition fee financial aid Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1赵中建.高等学校收费问题的比较研究[J].外国教育研究,1996(5):1-10. 被引量:7
  • 2闵维方,陈晓宇.中国高等教育经费需求与投资体制改革[J].教育研究,1994,15(12):30-38. 被引量:33
  • 3陈良火昆.我国高等教育实行个人(家庭)成本补偿的必然性[J].教育研究,1996,17(8):27-33. 被引量:12
  • 4陈良琨.我国高等教育实行个人(家庭)成本补偿的必然性[J].教育研究,1995,(11).
  • 5[3]McMahon, Walter. 1982. Efficiency and Equity Criteria for Educational Budgeting and Finance.In Financing Education:Overcoming Inefficiency and Inequity, ed. Walter McMahon and Terry Geske. Champaign, Ⅲ .: University of Illinois Press. Also see George Psacharopoulos & Maureen Woodhall, Education for Development: An analysis of Investment Choices , Oxford University Press. 1985. pp249~250.
  • 6[4]Bowman, Mary - Jean. Benoit Millot and Emesto Schiefelbein 1984. The Political Economy of Public Support for Higher Education:Studies in Chile, France, and Malaysia. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, Education Department.
  • 7[6]Alexander, Kern. 1982. Concepts of Equity. In Financing Education:Overcoming Inefficiency and Inequity, ed. Walter McMahon and Terry Geske. Champaign, Ⅲ.: University of Illinois Press.
  • 8[10]Marin A., and G. Psacharopoulos, 1976.Schooling and Income Distribution. Review of Economics and Statistics 58, No. 3, (August):332 ~ 338.
  • 9[11]Winegarden, C. R. Schooling and Income Distribution: Evidence fiom International Data.Economica (February)
  • 10[12]E. Cohn & T. G. Geske, the Economics of Education, 3rd edition, PERGAMON PRESS.(1990) pp125 ~ 131.

共引文献278

同被引文献214

引证文献25

二级引证文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部