摘要
控辩双方达成量刑协议是速裁程序和认罪认罚从宽制度试点提出的一项重要内容。随着全国人大常委会通过《关于修改〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的决定》,量刑建议的程序、方式、内容由司法文件正式上升为法律规范。提出相对精准的量刑建议是简化速裁程序和达成协商合意的内在要求,是量刑建议发展的应然方向。目前速裁程序量刑建议运行虽取得一定成效,但仍存在量刑幅度过于宽泛、量刑失衡、缓刑和具体罚金数额适用较低、辩方协商能力不足等问题,其深层次原因是检察系统量刑建议权缺乏规范制约及被追诉人辩护权保障不足。未来改革应当制定统一的量刑指引规范、提高量刑建议的相对精准度、增强量刑协商因子、完善相关配套措施,发挥量刑建议在实现被追诉人刑罚心理预期与法院判决一致性、保障罪责平衡性、提高程序效率性方面的作用。
The sentencing agreement is an important content proposed in the pilot of fast-track sentencing procedure and leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of sentence.As Standing Committee of the National People's Congress adopted Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress to Amend the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China,the procedure,method and content of sentencing proposal are formally elevated from judicial document to legal norm.Some good results have been achieved in the operation of sentencing suggestions,but there are still some problems,such as overly broad sentencing range,imbalance of sentencing,low application of probation and specific amount of fine,and the defense's lack of negotiation ability.The deep reason is the lack of standard restriction on the power of sentencing suggestions and protection of defendant right.Future reforms should formulate guidelines for sentencing,improve the relative accuracy of sentencing suggestions,enhance sentencing negotiation factors,and improve related supporting measures.
作者
李艳飞
LI Yan-fei(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第2期106-112,共7页
Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
基金
2018年重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYS18163)
2018年西南政法大学法学院创新课题(FXY20180053)
关键词
速裁程序
量刑建议
量刑规范化
量刑相对精准度
Fast-Track Sentencing Procedure
sentencing suggestions
standardization of sentencing
relative accuracy of sentencing
