摘要
刑事速裁程序特殊的立法定位与上诉权的价值追求之间存在紧张关系,由此引发了学界关于"速裁程序是否应当保留被追诉人上诉权"的理论争议。速裁程序立法上保留上诉权的规定不仅是坚持程序正义的体现,也是不能以任何理由限制、变相限制甚至剥夺速裁程序被追诉人上诉权的要求。当前速裁程序上诉表现出存在相当数量的上诉案件、技术性上诉占主导、二审多维持原判和撤诉等特点。为实现速裁程序"公正为本、效率优先"的价值目标,可以通过不断完善刑事速裁案件的程序性保障、弱化刑事速裁定罪判决的法律后果,使被追诉人服判息诉,进而真正实现公正基础上效率的提高。
Tension exists between the special legislation orientation of the fast-track sentencing procedure and the intrinsic value of the right of appeal. It is not only the embodiment of upholding procedural justice, but also the requirement that the litigant's right to appeal should not be limited or even deprived for any reason. Currently the appeal of the fast-track sentencing procedure show there are quite a number of appeals, technical appeals dominate, a second trial is upheld and the case is dropped, etc.. In order to realize the value of the "justice and efficiency first" in the fast-track sentencing procedure, we can improve the criminal procedure, weaken the legal consequence of the criminal speedy judgment so that the prosecution will not file an appeal so as to improve the efficiency on the basis of justice.
作者
杨丹丹
YANG Dan-dan(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China, 401120)
出处
《广东开放大学学报》
2019年第1期40-47,共8页
JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY
基金
2018年重庆市研究生科研创新项目资助(CYS18163)成果
关键词
速裁程序
上诉权
上诉理由
审级制度
fast-track sentencing procedure
right to appeal
grounds of appeal
criminal trial grade system
