期刊文献+

杠杆率监管引入对商业银行风险承担具有缓释效应吗?——基于中国96家商业银行的实证分析 被引量:23

Does the Introduction of Leverage Regulation Have a Slow-release Effect on Commercials Banks' Risk-taking?——Empirical Analysis Based on 96 Commercial Banks in China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国2011年开始引入杠杆率监管指标来监管银行的行为,杠杆率指标不考虑资产的风险权重,有效地控制了资产从风险水平较低向高风险转变时所引起的资本充足率监管工具的失效。本文使用2007—2016年中国96家商业银行的经营数据,研究杠杆率监管对中国商业银行风险承担的影响,分析其引入之后能否缓释与弱化银行风险承担的问题。研究发现,随着杠杆率监管的引入,银行增大了对自有资本的持有比例,降低了银行风险承担程度,提高了银行的稳定性。并且杠杆率监管对商业银行风险承担缓释效应存在异质性。银行资产质量越差时,引入杠杆率监管对银行产生的风险缓释效果越明显。同时,也会给资产质量较好但杠杆率指标不达标的银行带来监管方面的压力。 In 2011,China began to introduce the regulatory indicator of leverage ratio to supervise the activities of banks.The leverage ratio indicator does not consider the risk weight of assets,but effectively controls the failure of the capital adequacy regulatory tool caused by the transformation of assets from low risk to high risk.Using the operating data of 96 commercial banks from 2007 to 2016,this paper studies the impact of leverage ratio regulation on the risk-taking of Chinese commercial banks,and analyzes whether it can slow down and weaken the risk bearing of banks after the introduction.It is found that with the introduction of the regulation of leverage ratio,banks increase the proportion of their own capital,reduced the risk-taking and improved the stability.Moreover,the regulation of leverage ratio has heterogeneity on the slow-release effect of risk bearing of commercial banks.The worse the bank s asset quality,the greater the risk mitigation effect of introducing leverage regulation.At the same time,it will also put regulatory pressure on banks with better asset quality but lower leverage ratio.
作者 张庆君 陈思 ZHANG Qingjun;CHEN Si(Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222)
出处 《经济与管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期29-44,共16页 Research on Economics and Management
关键词 杠杆率监管 商业银行 风险承担 资产质量 缓释效应 资本充足率 leverage ratio regulation commerical bank risk taking asset quality slow-release effect capital adequacy ratio
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献41

  • 1朱建武.监管压力下的中小银行资本与风险调整行为分析[J].当代财经,2006(1):65-70. 被引量:48
  • 2吴栋,周建平.资本要求和商业银行行为:中国大中型商业银行的实证分析[J].金融研究,2006(8):144-153. 被引量:75
  • 3Modigliani F. &Miller M. H., "The cost of capital, corporate finance, and the theory of investment", American Economic Review, 1958,48.
  • 4Modigliani F. &Miller M.H., "Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: a Correction", American E- conomic Review, June, 1963,53.
  • 5Koehn M, Santomero A M. "Regulation of bank cap ital and portfolio risk", Journal of Finance, 1980, 35 (5) .
  • 6Kim D, Santomero A M. "Risk in banking and cap- ital regulation , Journal of Finance, 988 , 43(5) .
  • 7Furlong F T, Keeley M C. "Capital regulation and bank risk taking : A note", Journal of Banking and Fi- nance , 1989, 13(6).
  • 8Keetey M C , Furlong F T. "A reexamination of mean2variance analysis of bank capital regulation", Journal of Banking and Finance, 1990, 14(1 ) .
  • 9Rochet, Jean. Charles. "Capital requirements and the behaviour of commercial banks", European Economic Review, 1992, 36.
  • 10Hildebrand, P. "Is Basel II Enough? The Benefits of a Leverage Ratio", Lecture presented at the London School of Economics, 2008,15 December.

共引文献177

同被引文献280

引证文献23

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部