期刊文献+

彩超联合核磁共振检查在胎盘植入中的诊断价值研究 被引量:2

Diagnostic Value of Color Doppler Ultrasound Combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Placental Implantation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的研究分析彩超联合核磁共振检查在胎盘植入中的诊断价值。方法本次研究时间筛选2015年至2018年高度怀疑胎盘植入的患者71例为研究对象,两组患者均接受彩色多普勒超声检查及核磁共振检查。比较两种检查单独应用检查准确率以及两种联合检查诊断准确率。结果彩色多普勒超声检查符合率84.51%,核磁共振检查符合率85.92%,两种检查方式比较差异较小,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两种检查联合诊断准确率94.37%,两种检查联合诊断准确率较单独检查准确率比较有明显差异(P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义。结论临床胎盘植入是急重症,其中彩超临床的检查的效果较好,同时辅以核磁共振成像,两者联合检查大大降低临床漏诊率,提高检查的准确率。 Objective To study and analyze the diagnostic value of color doppler ultrasound combined with nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in placental implantation.Methods Seventy-one patients with high suspicion of placental implantation from2015to2018were selected as subjects in this study.Patients in both groups received color doppler ultrasonography and MRI.Comparative analysis was conducted between the diagnostic accuracy of the two tests in individual use and in combined use.Results The coincidence rate of color doppler ultrasound examination was84.51%,and the nuclear magnetic resonance examination was85.92%.The difference between the two examination methods was relatively small and there was no statistical significance(P>0.05).The accuracy of the combined diagnosis of the two kinds of examinations was94.37%.The accuracy of the combined diagnosis of the two kinds of examinations was significantly different from that of the single examination(P<0.05),and the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion Clinical placental implantation is an urgent and serious disease,in which the effect of color doppler ultrasound clinical examination is better,supplemented by MRI.The combined examination of the two greatly reduces the rate of clinical missed diagnosis,improve the accuracy of the examination.
作者 陆国荣 LU Guorong(Department of Obstetrics, Chenzhou First People's Hospital, Chenzhou Hunan 423000, China)
出处 《中国医疗设备》 2018年第A02期81-82,84,共3页 China Medical Devices
关键词 彩超 联合 核磁共振 胎盘植入 诊断 价值 color doppler ultrasound joint nuclear magnetic resonance placental implantation diagnosis value
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1郑美云.剖宫产次数与前置胎盘及胎盘植入相关因素分析[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2004,13(16):2146-2147. 被引量:20
  • 2谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:258-264.
  • 3Chattopadhyay SK, Kharif H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta praevia and accreta alter previous caesarean section [ J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1993,52 ( 3 ) : 151 - 156.
  • 4Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y, et al. Cesarean section delivery a- mong primiparous women in rural China:an emerging epidemic [ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2010,202( 1 ) :65. el - 6.
  • 5Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD, et al. Accuracy of ultra- sonography and magetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta[ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006,108 ( 3 Pt 1 ) : 573 -581.
  • 6Lax A, Prince MR, Mennitt KW, et al. The value of specific MRI features in the evalution of suspected placental invasion [ J ]. Magn Reson Imaging,2007,25 ( 1 ) :87 - 93.
  • 7Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Pla- centa praevia : diagnosis and management [ J ]. London (UK) ; 2005 Oct.
  • 8Hull AD, Moore TR, Multiple. Repeat cesareans and the threat ofplacenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management [ J ]. Clin- perinato1,2011,38 ( 2 ) :285 - 296.
  • 9Clouqueur E, Rubod C, PaquinA, et al. Placenta accreta : diagno- sis and management in a French type-3 maternity hospital[ J]. J Gynecol 0bstet Biol Repmd(Paris) ,2008,37 ( 5 ) :499 - 504.
  • 10Eller AG,Bennett MA, Sharshiner M, et al. Maternal morbidity in cases of placenta care team compared with standard obstetric care [ J ]. Obstet Gyneco1,201 l, 117 ( 2 ) :331 - 337.

共引文献105

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部