期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT在评估冠状动脉重度狭窄患者心功能中的应用 被引量:7

Multi-slice Spiral CT in Assessing Cardiac Function in Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Stenosis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的分析多层螺旋CT在评估冠状动脉重度狭窄患者心功能中的应用价值。方法根据多层螺旋CT血管造影(CTA)检查结果和血管管腔直径判断冠脉狭窄程度,并根据判断结果将180例冠状动脉狭窄患者分为四组:轻度狭窄组(n=38)、中度狭窄组(n=58)、重度狭窄组(n=48)、闭塞组(n=36),均行多层螺旋CT心脏扫描,测量左心房功能参数,包括左心房舒张末期容积(LAEDV)、收缩末期容积(LAESV)、左室每搏输出量(LVSV)、左室心肌质量(LVMM)、左心房射血分数(LAEF)等,并行超声心动图检查测量上述参数。结果多层螺旋CT检查中各项左心房功能参数与超声心动图检查结果比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多层螺旋CT检查结果显示轻度狭窄组、中度狭窄组、重度狭窄组、闭塞组左心室各参数LAEDV、LAESV、LVSV、LVMM、LAEF比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);轻度狭窄组、中度狭窄组左心室各参数比较差异不显著(P>0.05),重度狭窄组、闭塞组左心室各参数比较差异不显著(P>0.05),但与轻度狭窄组和中度狭窄组相比,重度狭窄组、闭塞组LAEDV、LAESV、LVMM显著较高,LVSV、LAEF显著较低(P<0.05)。随冠状动脉狭窄程度加重LVEDV、LVESV、LVMM水平明显升高,呈正相关(r=0.38,0.35,0.42,P<0.05),LVEF、LVSV水平明显下降,呈负相关(r=-0.32,-0.41,P<0.05)。结论多层螺旋CT定量评价冠状动脉重度狭窄及左室收缩功能准确、可靠,可同时评估冠状动脉狭窄情况和左心室功能。 Objective To evaluate the application value of multi-slice spiral CT in assessing cardiac function in patients with severe coronary artery stenosis.Methods The coronary artery stenosis degree was determined by the multi-slice spiral CT angiography(CTA)examination results and the vascular lumen diameter,and according to this judgment results,180 cases of patients with coronary artery stenosis were divided into four groups:the mild stenosis group(n=38),the moderate stenosis group(n=58),the severe stenosis group(n=48)and the occlusion group(n=36).And the four groups were performed multi-slice spiral CT cardiac scanning.The left atrial function parameters were measured,including left atrial end diastolic volume(LAEDV),end-systolic volume(LAESV),left ventricular stroke volume(LVSV),left ventricular mass(LVMM),left atrial ejection fraction(LAEF),and so on.And the echocardiography was used to measure the abovementioned parameters.Results There were no significant differences in left atrial function parameters between echocardiography and multi-slice spiral CT(P>0.05).The results of multi-slice spiral CT showed that there were significant differences in left ventricular parameters(LAEDV,LAESV,LVSV,LVMM and LAEF)between the mild stenosis group,the moderate stenosis group,the severe stenosis group and the occlusion group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the left ventricle parameters between the mild stenosis group and the moderate stenosis group,and there was no significant difference in the left ventricle parameters between the severe stenosis group and the occusion group(P>0.05),but the levels of LAEDV,LAESV and LVMM were significantly higher and the levels of LVSV and LAEF were significantly lower in the severe stenosis group and the occlusion group compared with those in the mild stenosis group and the moderate stenosis group(P<0.05).With the coronary artery stenosis degree increased,the levels of LVEDV,LVESV and LVMM were increased and they were positively correlated(r=0.38,0.35,0.42,P<0.05),and the levels of LVEF and LVSV were decreased and they were negatively correlated(r=-0.32,-0.41,P<0.05).Conclusion Multi-slice spiral CT quantitative assessment is accurate and reliable in the severe coronary artery stenosis and left ventricular systolic function,and can simultaneously assess coronary artery stenosis and left ventricular function.
作者 周贺民 王赢 张娜 ZHOU He-min;WANG Ying;ZHANG Na(Department of Emergency,Zhumadian Central Hospital,Zhumadian 463000,Henan Province,China)
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2017年第12期44-47,共4页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
关键词 多层螺旋CT 冠状动脉狭窄 重度 心功能 Multi-slice Spiral CT Coronary Artery Stenosis Severe Cardiac Function
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献134

  • 1高波,郭启勇,岳勇,侯阳,雷晶.64层螺旋CT与磁共振成像评价左心功能的比较研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(1):66-69. 被引量:24
  • 2王翔,金朝林,张树桐,肖建伟.64层CT冠状动脉造影和左心功能分析预测急性心肌梗塞风险的初步研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(3):328-332. 被引量:10
  • 3崔炜,戴汝平,郭玉印,吕滨,何沙,荆宝莲,白桦,任力.超高速CT评价心室容积准确性的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,1997,31(2):93-95. 被引量:27
  • 4高波,郭启勇,雷晶,岳勇,侯阳,陈丽英.MSCT、超声心动图与MRI评价左心功能的比较研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(10):985-989. 被引量:24
  • 5Poulsen SH, Jensen SE, Egstrup K. Longitudinal changes and prognostic implications of left ventricular diastolic function in first acute myocardial infarction [J]. Am Heart J, 1999,137(5) :910-918.
  • 6Quintana M, Edner M, Kahan T, et al. Is left ventricular diastolic function an independent marker of prognosis after acute myocardial infarction? [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2004,96(2) : 183-189.
  • 7Rathi VK, Biederman RW. Imaging of ventricular function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance [J]. CurrCardiol Rep, 2004, 6(1):55-61.
  • 8King DL, Harrison MR, King DL Jr., et al. Improved reproducibility of left atrial and left ventricular measurements by guided three-dimensional echocardiography [J]. J Am CollCardiol, 1992,20(5) : 1238-1245.
  • 9Greupner J, Zimmermann E. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left eineventficulography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracie echoeardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard [J]. J Am CollCardiol, 2012,59(21 ) : 1897-1907.
  • 10Norris RM, White HD, Cross DB, et al. Prognosisafter recovery from myocardial infarction: the relative importanceof cardiac dilatation and coronary stenoses [J ]. Eur Heart J, 1992,13 (12):1611-1618.

共引文献67

同被引文献61

引证文献7

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部