期刊文献+

作战行动序列核心本体建模及其推理方法 被引量:6

Core ontology modeling and reasoning method for course of action
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解决作战计划数据、信息、知识的一致性理解与互操作等问题,使其表示、生成和检验在一致的语义下进行,提出了作战计划本体的构建方法,详细阐述了通用本体、性能度量本体、效能度量本体、行动本体、行动序列本体和偏好本体等6类核心本体的建模过程,规范了作战计划领域共享概念的形式化描述。基于核心本体建立了自动分类、行动-状态组合以及行动序列优选等3项推理规则,并结合反叛乱行动计划分析了该推理规则能够有效提升计划生成效率,为面向决策的智能化作战行动过程动态生成与检验奠定了基础。 In order to solve the problems of consistent understanding among operational plan data,information and knowledge and their interoperation,and make the plan generation and validation semantically consis-tent,an approach to operational plan ontology construction is proposed,which explains the ontological modeling of the common knowledge,the measure of performance,the measure of effectiveness,operational activities,course of action(COA)and activity preference for regulating the formal description of shared concepts in the operational plan field.Based on the core ontologies,three inference rules are established for automatic classification,activity-state combination and selection of COA.Based on the counterinsurgency plan analysis,those inference rules are proved to improve the efficiency of plan generation,therefore,they can lay the foundation for the intelligent decision making of the dynamic generation and validation of operational plans.
作者 程恺 陈刚 尹成祥 康睿智 康兴挡 CHENG Kai;CHEN Gang;YIN Chengxiang;KANG Ruizhi;KANG Xingdang(College of Command and Control Engineering, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China)
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期805-814,共10页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家自然科学基金(71501186) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20150720)资助课题
关键词 本体 构建策略 推理规则 作战计划 作战行动序列 ontology construction strategy inference rule operational plan course of action
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献92

  • 1修佳鹏,熊燕,张雷,吴建林.基于OWL的战场本体构建方法[J].郑州大学学报(理学版),2007,39(2):136-141. 被引量:10
  • 2孙严,戴浩.基于能力的军事需求方法简介[J].科学技术与工程,2007,7(9):2170-2176. 被引量:34
  • 3Blythe J,Gil Y.A problem-solving method for plan evaluation and critiquing[C]//Proceedings of the 12th Banff Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling, and Management (KAW' 99), Banff, Alberta, 1999.
  • 4Cohen P,Schrag R,Jones E,et al.The DARPA high-performance knowledge bases project[J].AI Magazine, 1998.
  • 5IET.Rapid knowledge formation program[EB/OL].http://www.iet.com/ Projects/RKF/.
  • 6Bowman M,Lopez A M,Tecuci G.Ontology development for military applications[C]//Proceedings of the Thirty-ninth Annual ACM Southeast Conference, Athens, GA, 2001 : 112-117.
  • 7Bowman M.A methodology for modeling expert knowledge that supports teaching-based development of Agents[D].School of Information Technology and Engineering,George Mason University,Fairfax Virginia.
  • 8Lenat D.CYC:A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1995,38( 11 ).
  • 9Chaudhri V K,Farquhar A,Fikes R,et al.OKBC:A programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability[C]//AAAI Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence,Madison,Wisconsin,July 26-30,1998.
  • 10Boicu M,Tecuci G,Bowman M,et al.A problem-oriented approach to ontology creation and maintenance[C]//Farquhar A,Stoffel K.Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence(AAAI-99) Workshop on "Ontology Management" ,July 18- 19,Orlando,Florida.Menlo Park,CA:AAAI Press/MIT Press,1999.

共引文献89

同被引文献110

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部