期刊文献+

论非法证据排除规则的价值 被引量:40

Value of the Principle of Excluding Illegally Obtained Evidence
原文传递
导出
摘要 非法证据排除规则在证据史上具有进步意义 ,它体现了对人的尊重。从程序正义和实体正义两方面考察 ,该规则都是有价值的 ,其价值大于成本。为了增加其价值 ,降低其成本 。 The exclusionary rule has progressive value in the history of evidence,manifests the respect for human being,and has rationality in itself.The rule is valuable in procedure justice and substantive justice, and its value is more than its cost.With a view to increasing its value and decreasing its cost,attention should be given to both the general justice and the justice in concrete cases.
作者 杨宇冠
机构地区 中国政法大学
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第3期111-118,共8页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 非法证据排除规则 价值取向 司法公正 证据制度 Excluding Illegally Obtained Evidence Value Judicial Justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Irvine v. California, 347 U. S. 128,136 (1954).
  • 2Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 415 (1971).
  • 3Stone,500 (Chief Justice Burger concurring).
  • 4Mr. Justice Clark, Mapp v Ohio, 367. U.S. 643 (1961).
  • 5United States v. Peliter, 422 U.S. 531,554 (1975) (Justice Brennan dissenting).
  • 6Charles F. Hemphill, Jr. Criminal Procedure, Goodyear Publishing Co. , Inc 1978.
  • 7Peopler. Defore, 160N. E. (1926) P. 578.
  • 8Calandra, 347,1974.
  • 9Wolf: A Survey of the Expanded Exclusionary Rule, 32 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 193, 216 (1963).
  • 10The criminal goes free, if he must, but it is the law that sets him free. Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence. 367 U.S. at 659.

共引文献151

引证文献40

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部