摘要
对于领主属宾句的生成,学界一直有很大争议。有人主张领有名词基础生成说,有人坚持领有名词提升说。本文认为,虽然汉语没有屈折变化,但依然可以找到证据证明领有名词提升假设的合理性。根据领有名词提升假说,在领有名词提升之前,它和被领有名词共处于一个DP中。基于此,本文对DP做了深入探讨。研究发现,DP结构和领主属宾句具有相同的句法、语义特性,且遵守同样的限制条件。这跟领有名词提升假设正好吻合,但跟基础假说却无法兼容。本文还指出基础生成假设有很多问题无法解决,这也间接为领有名词提升假说提供了支撑。
It remains controversial how the possessor-subject-possessum-object constructions are derived.Some scholars put forward the assumption that the possessor is base-generated in the preverbal position,whereas others stick to the possessor raising hypothesis.This paper argues that we can find some evidence in support of the possessor raising hypothesis even though Chinese is short of inflections.In accordance with the possessor raising hypothesis,the possessor noun and the possessum noun should originate in a big DP.In this paper,we will make a detailed study of the DP structure.It is discovered that DP constructions and the possessor-subject-possessum-object construction display the same syntactic and semantic properties and are subject to the same constraints.This fits well with the possessor raising approach but is incompatible with assumption that the subject is base-generated in the subject position.In addition,it is also pointed out there are facts that are hard to explain if the possessor is base-generated in the subject position.All these lend support to the possessor raising hypothesis.
出处
《外文研究》
2018年第3期1-6,14,共7页
Foreign Studies
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目“语段与加标理论视角下的句法孤岛现象研究”(16YJC740064)
浙江省社会科学规划重点项目“基于加标理论的英汉句法移位限制机制研究”(18NDJC034Z)
