期刊文献+

改良颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效评价 被引量:7

Clinical evaluation of modified posterior cervical open-door laminoplasty in the treatment of multi-segment cervical spondylosis myelopathy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨多节段脊髓型颈椎病采用改良颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗的临床效果。方法将74例多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者随机分为研究组(37例)和对照组(37例),研究组采用改良颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术,对照组采用传统C3-7单开门椎板成形术治疗,观察对比相关指标。结果研究组手术时间、术中出血量明显低于对照组(P<0.05),研究组术后并发症发生率为10.81%,略低于对照组的24.32%(P>0.05);随访1年,两组术后JOA评分改善率无显著差异(P>0.05);研究组ROM丢失度明显小于对照组,CCI丢失率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论采用改良颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者效果显著,可有效降低术后并发症发生率,改善ROM及CCI,值得推广应用。 Objective To discuss the clinical effect of modified posterior cervical open -doorlaminoplasty in the treatment of multi-segment cervical spondylosis myelopathy. Methods Seventy-four patients with multi-segment cervical spondylosis myelopathy treated in our hospital were randomlydivided into study group (37 cases) and control group ( 37 cases). The study group was treated withmodified posterior cervical open-door laminoplasty, while the control group was treated with traditionalopen door laminoplasty of C3 -7 for treatment. The operation time, bleeding volume, incidence rate ofpostoperative complication, improvement rates of JOA scores, cervical range of motion (ROM) andcervical curvature indicators (CCI) were compared between the two groups. Results The operationtime and bleeding volume in the study group were obviously lower than those in the control group (P〈0.05), and the incidence rate of complications in the study group was 10.81%, which was slightly lowerthan 24.32% in the control group (P〉0.05). The patients were followed up for 1 year, there was noobvious difference in the improvement rate of JOA scores (P〉0.05).The ROM loss degree in the studygroup was obviously less than that in the control group, and the CCI loss rate was obviously lower thanthat in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect of modified posterior cervical open-doorlaminoplasty in the treatment of multi-segment cervical spondylosis myelopathy is significant, whichcan effectively reduce the incidence rate of complications after operation and improve the ROM andCCI, it is worthy of wide promotion and application in clinic.
作者 张林 张兵 鲍亮 康晋 ZHANG Lin;ZHANG Bing;BAO Liang(Department of Orthopaedics,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical College,Xi'an,Shanxi710038,China)
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2018年第6期718-720,共3页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
关键词 改良 颈椎后路 单开门椎管扩大成形术 脊髓型颈椎病 modified posterior cervical open -door laminoplasty cervical spondylosismyelopathy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献52

  • 1张英泽,申勇,王伟,董玉昌,张标.脊髓型颈椎病手术方法选择及临床疗效观察[J].河北医药,2005,27(7):485-486. 被引量:7
  • 2王沛,郭世绂.脊髓型颈椎病[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(2):126-129. 被引量:33
  • 3杨有庚.对多节段颈椎病是前路手术好还是后路手术好?[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(2):91-93. 被引量:11
  • 4秦海江,聂新富,段广斌,郭鹏.脊髓型颈椎病手术疗效分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2007,13(5):302-303. 被引量:5
  • 5金大地.现代脊柱外科手术学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2009:386.
  • 6Schultz KD,McLaughlin MR,Haid RW,et al.Single stage anterior posterior decompression and stabilization for complex cervical spine disorders[J].J Neurosurg,2000,93(2):214.
  • 7Sasai K,Saito T,Akagi S,et al.Preventing C5 palsy after laminop lasty[J].Spine,2003,28(17):1972.
  • 8Wang My,Green Ba. Open--door cervical expansile laminoplasty[J]. Neurosurg, 2004,54( 1 ) : 119-124.
  • 9Edwards CC, Heller JC,Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy:an independent matched-cohort analysis[J]. Spine,2002,27 : 1168-1175.
  • 10Magerl F,Seeman PS. Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation[M]. In:Kehr P,Weidner A,eds. Cervical Spine. New York : Spring-Verlag, 1987.217-322.

共引文献114

同被引文献71

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部