期刊文献+

超细胸腔引流管在电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用效果分析 被引量:16

Effect analysis of super fine thoracic drainage tube on the treatment of patients with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨超细胸腔引流管在电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术(VATS)中的应用效果。方法回顾性分析78例行VATS非小细胞肺癌患者的临床资料,其中实验组50例采用超细引流管辅助粗引流管胸腔闭式引流术,对照组37例采用常规改良胸腔闭式引流管。观察2组患者胸腔引流效果、疼痛评分。结果实验组1~4 d胸腔积液引流总量显著高于对照组(P<0.05),1~10 d总引流量及引流管留置时间无显著差异(P>0.05)。2组患者术后12 h VAS疼痛评分无显著差异(P>0.05),24~72 h静息及咳嗽时VAS疼痛评分有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论 VATS术后超细引流管辅助胸腔闭式引流更有效。 Objective To explore the effect of super fine thoracic drainage tube on the treatment of patients with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS).Methods Clinical materials of 78 NSCLC patients with VATS were analyzed retrospectively.Fifty cases in the experimental group were treated with super fine drainage tube and thick drainage tube for closed thoracic drainage,and 37 cases in the control group were treated with conventional modified thoracic drainage tube.Effect of thoracic drainage and the scores of VAS were compared.Results The total drainage volume of pleural effusion in the experimental group from 1 st to 4th day was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05),but there was no significant differences in total drainage volume and indwelling time of drainage tube from 1 s,to 10th day between two groups (P > 0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in VAS score at 12 h after operation (P > 0.05),but the difference of VAS score from 24 to 72 h at resting and coughing were significant between two groups (P < 0.05).Conclusion After VATS,assisted super fine drainage tube is effective in closed thoracic drainage.
作者 王新连 俞峥 顾家榕 徐伟峰 陆斌 WANG Xinlian;YU Zheng;GU Jiarong;XU Weifeng;LU Bin(Xishan People's Hospital,Wuxi,Jiangsu,214000)
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2018年第11期106-108,共3页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术 超细引流管 疼痛评分 video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy super fine thoracic drainage tube VAS score
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1李树满,史双全,朱俊平.用中心静脉导管进行胸腔闭式引流105例报告[J].天津医药,2006,34(6):425-426. 被引量:16
  • 2肯尼思主编,陈克能,张伟,等主译.现代胸外科治疗学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.1.
  • 3Baumann MH,Strange C.Treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax:a more aggressive approach? Chest,1997,112(3):789-804.
  • 4Batchelder TL,Morris KA.Critical factors in determining adequate plenral drainage in both the operated and nonoperated.Am Surg,1962,28:296-302.
  • 5Miller KS,Sahn SA.Chest tubes.Indications,technique,management and complications.Chest,1987,91(2):258-264.
  • 6Baumann MH.What size chest tube?What drainage system is ideal? And other chest tube management questions.Curr Opin Pulm Med,2003,9(4):276-281.
  • 7Davies CW,Gleeson FV,Davies RJ,et al.BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection.Thorax,2003,58(Suppl 2):s18-s28.
  • 8Ieard P, Chautard J, Zhang X, et al. A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobeetomy: a study on 100 consecutive eases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2006 ,30 :649 - 651.
  • 9Terzi A, Feil B, Bonadiman C, et al. The use of flexible spiral drains after non-cardiac thoracic surgery. A clinical study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ,2005,27 : 134 - 137.
  • 10Kejriwal NK, Newman MA. Use of a single silastic chest drain follow- ing thoracotomy : initial evaluation. ANZ J Surg, 2005, 75 : 710 -712.

共引文献20

同被引文献104

引证文献16

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部