期刊文献+

微小残留病变检测在儿童急性白血病中的应用 被引量:5

Clinical application of minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute leukemia
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,儿童急性白血病(AL)治疗效果随化疗方案的改进和危险分层治疗的引入取得很大进展。但微小残留病变(MRD)仍然是影响AL预后的一大难题。MRD水平影响化疗方案的选择、复发风险的分级,同时还可用于判断预后。目前检测MRD的方法主要有流式细胞术(FCM)和PCR。随着二代测序技术(NGS)的不断成熟与发展,其在MRD检测尤其在干细胞移植(SCT)后MRD检测方面扮演着重要角色。本文对微小残留病变检测在儿童急性白血病中的应用进行综述。 In recent years, great progress has been made in the treatment outcome of childhood acute leukemia with the improvement of chemotherapy regimens and the introduction of risk-stratified therapy; however, minimal residual disease(MRD) is still a difficult problem which affects the prognosis of acute leukemia. MRD influences the selection of chemotherapy regimens and recurrence risk stratification, and meanwhile, it can be used for prognostic prediction. At present, flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction are mainly used for MRD detection. The next-generation sequencing also plays an important role in MRD detection, especially in MRD detection after stem cell transplantation. This article reviews the methodology and significance of MRD detection in childhood acute leukemia.
作者 程艳芹 翟晓文 CHENG Yan-Qin;ZHAI Xiao-Wen.(Department of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201102, China)
出处 《中国当代儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第5期416-420,共5页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
基金 上海市科委重大课题子课题(14411950603)
关键词 急性白血病 微小残留病变 预后 二代测序 儿童 Acute leukemia Minimal residual disease Prognosis Next-generation sequencing Child
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献147

  • 1顾龙君.儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病诊疗建议(第三次修订草案)[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(5):392-395. 被引量:485
  • 2王婷玉,刘霆.慢性髓细胞白血病造血干细胞移植术后微小残留病变监测的进展[J].四川医学,2006,27(7):677-679. 被引量:1
  • 3Moricke A, Zimmermann M, Reiter A, et al. Prognostic impact of age in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Data from the trials ALL - BFM 86, 90, and 95 [ J]. Klin Padiatr,2005,217(6) : 310 - 320.
  • 4Stock W, La M, Sanford B, et al. What determines the outcomes for ado- lescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children's Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies [ J ]. Blood, 2008,112 (5) : 1646 - 1654.
  • 5Dordelmann M, Reiter A, Borkhardt A, et al. Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia[ J ]. Blood, 1999, 94 (4) : 1209 - 1217.
  • 6Kosaka Y, Koh K, Kinukawa N, et al. Infant acute lymphoblastic leu- kemia with MLL gene rearrangements: Outcome following intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [ J ]. Blood, 2004,104 (12) :3527 - 3534.
  • 7Smith M, Arthur D, Camitta B, et al. Uniform approach to risk classifi-cation and treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia[ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 1996,14 ( 1 ) : 18 - 24.
  • 8Burger B, Zimmermann M, Mann G, et al. Diagnostic cerebrospinal fluid examination in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia:Signifi- cance of low leukocyte counts with blasts or traumatic lumbar puncture [J]. J Clin Oncol,2003,21 (2) :184 - 188.
  • 9Gajjar A, Harrison PL, Sandlund JT, et al. Traumatic lumbar puncture at diagnosis adversely affects outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia[ J]. Blood,2000,96(10) :3381 - 3384.
  • 10Pui CH, Sandlund JT, Pei D, et al. Improved outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of total therapy study XIIIB at St Jude children' s research hospital [ J ]. Blood, 2004, 104 ( 9 ) : 2690 - 2696.

共引文献38

同被引文献26

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部