摘要
为促进程序正义的实现,我国亟待对级别管辖、审限、举证期限、鉴定、诉讼义务等规范进行修订,并在此基础之上进行司法多元化、电子化和专业化的改革。有效的司法管理可以促进民事司法高效运转。但民事司法不是服务。为了实现十九大提出的"全面落实司法责任制"的要求,未来应当反思"司法服务论"的观点,并调整诉讼效率、当事人满意等考核指标,转而维护法官法定、武器平等、直接与言词等诉讼原则。尽管发展替代性纠纷解决尤其是在线调解机制具有积极意义,但司法的未来仍取决于诉讼而非调解。司法多元化的改革,仅意味着司法由两大支柱体系转向由诉讼、公证和调解构成的三大支柱体系。在"纠纷预防胜于纠纷解决"的政策指引下,对我国公证进行电子化改革亦刻不容缓。
In order to improve procedural justice, it will be very useful to modify the provisions on subject matter jurisdiction, trial period, expert evaluation, procedural obligation and etc. Effective judicial management can promote judicial efficiency. However, civil justice is not service in nature. The theory of ＂justice as service＂ should be abandoned, and it is not optional to pay excessive attention to judicial efficiency, judicial economy and satisfaction of parties. On the contrary, it is of much importance to guarantee legal judges, the principle of equal weapon and the principle of direct trial. The plural reform of the civil justice means that the mediation should be taken into account and that the civil justice should consist of the civil trial, the mediation and the notary. The function of the notary should not be underrated.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期53-76,共24页
China Legal Science
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目"当事人平等原则与民事证明减轻体系的建构"(项目批准号:16BFX094)的研究成果
