期刊文献+

棘突悬吊式椎管扩大椎板成形术治疗后纵韧带骨化症患者K线后移程度与临床疗效的相关性 被引量:4

Correlation between posterior shift of K-line and outcome of laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous process for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨颈椎后路棘突悬吊式椎管扩大椎板成形术治疗K线阳性后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)患者K线后移程度与手术疗效之间的相关性。方法回顾性分析2014年1月—2015年12月本院骨科收治的62例K线(+)OPLL患者的临床资料,所有患者均行颈椎后路棘突悬吊式椎管扩大椎板成形术。将椎管最狭窄处骨化块与K线之间的垂直距离定义为KM值,用以量化K线的位置,并用手术前后KM的差值(ΔKM)表示K线的移动程度。比较患者ΔKM值、手术前后C_(2~7) Cobb角的差异。根据患者ΔKM平均值将患者分为A组(ΔKM高于平均值)和B组(ΔKM低于平均值),比较2组患者年龄、手术时间、随访时间、手术前后C_(2~7) Cobb角、日本骨科学会(JOA)评分及JOA改善率。应用Pearson相关性分析探讨所有患者ΔKM值与JOA评分改善率之间的相关性。结果所有患者术后KM值均较术前增加,即K线后移;手术前后C_(2~7) Cobb角无明显变化。2组手术前后C_(2~7) Cobb角、手术时间及随访时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组患者年龄明显低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);排除年龄影响后,A组患者术后JOA评分、JOA评分改善率高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且ΔKM值与JOA评分改善率之间呈正相关。结论颈椎后路棘突悬吊式椎管扩大椎板成形术可有效改善OPLL患者临床症状,其机制可能是C_2、T_1处潜行减压后K线后移。 Objective To investigate the correlation between the posterior shift of the K-line and the outcome of laminoplasty with reattachment of the spinous process for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament(OPLL). Methods From 2014 to 2015,62 patients with K-line(+) OPLL underwent laminoplasty were included in the study. The KM was defined as a vertical interval from the ossified mass at the most narrow level of the spinal canal to the K-line. The KM not only can quantify the K-line,but also present the change of K-line pre-and postoperation(ΔKM). The pre-and postoperative C_(2-7) Cobb's angle and ΔKM value were compared in all the patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the mean value of the ΔKM of all patients :in group A,the ΔKM was greater than mean value;in group B,the ΔKM was less than the mean value. Age,operative time,follow-up time,recovery rate of Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) score,pre-and postoperative C_(2-7) Cobb's angle were compared between the 2 groups. The ΔKM value and recovery rate of JOA was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. Results After operation,the KM value of all patients was increased than that before operation,which indicated that the K-line shift posteriorly. There was no significant change in the C_(2-7) Cobb's angle before and after the operation. Pre-and postoperative C_(2-7) Cobb's angle,operative time and follow-up time showed no significantly difference between the 2 groups(P > 0.05). Age of patients in group A was lower than that of group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Except the influence of age,postoperative JOA scores and the recovery rate of JOA score of patients in group A were higher than that in group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between ΔKM value and the recovery rate of JOA score. Conclusion Posterior laminoplasty with reattachment of the spinous process can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of OPLL patients,the mechanism may be the K-line shift after decompression at C_2 and T_1.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2018年第1期22-26,共5页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 颈椎 骨化 后纵韧带 减压术 外科 Cervical vertebrae Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament Decompression surgical
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献68

  • 1李云恺,王惠,左金良.颈椎后纵韧带骨化症[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2005,2(2):24-26. 被引量:2
  • 2Choi S,Lee SH, Lee JY, et al. Factors affecting prognosis of patients who underwent eorpeetomy and fusion for treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: analysis of 47 patients [J].J Spinal Disord Teeh,2005,18(4): 309-314.
  • 3Chen Y,Chen DY,Wang XW, et al. Anterior corpectomy and fusion for severe ossifieation of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine [J].Intemational Orthopaedics (SICOT), 2009,33 (2) :477-482.
  • 4Fujiyoshi T,Yamazaki M,Kawabe J, et al. A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament:the K-line [J].Spine, 2008,33 (26) : E990-E993.
  • 5Masaki Y,Yamazaki M,Okawa A,et al. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament:anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20( 1 ) :7-13.
  • 6Iwasaki M,Kawaguchi Y,Kimura T,et al. Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine:more than 10 years follow up [J].J Neurosurg,2002,96(2 Suppl):180-189.
  • 7Kawaguehi Y,Kanamori M,Ishihara H,et al.Progression of os- sification of the posterior longitudinal ligament following en bloc cervical laminoplasty [J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2001,83 (12) : 1798-1802.
  • 8Isu T, Minoshima S, Mabuchi S. Anterior decompression and fusion using bone grafts obtained from cervical vertebral bodies for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine:technical note [J]. Neurosurgery,1997,40 (4) :866-870.
  • 9Yamazaki A,Homma T,Uchiyama S,et al.Morphologic limitations of posterior decompression by midsagittal splitting method for myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 1999,24 ( 1 ) : 32-34.
  • 10Iwasaki M,Okuda S,Miyauchi A,et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.Part 2:advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty[J].Spine,2007,32(6):654-660.

共引文献77

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部