期刊文献+

颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术铰链侧不同程度骨折后骨愈合的对比研究 被引量:6

The bony fusions for different hinge fractures in cervical laminoplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形微型钢板固定术后椎板铰链侧不同程度骨折的断端骨愈合情况。方法2009年9月至2011年12月采用颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形Centerpiece钢板固定术治疗的患者49例,男41例,女8例;年龄34~83岁,平均61岁。根据术后CT扫描,将椎板铰链侧骨折分为不完全骨折和完全骨折。完全骨折分为四型:Ⅰ型,骨折断端无移位分离;Ⅱ型,骨折断端部分移位或分离;Ⅲ型,骨折断端完全移位分离;Ⅳ型,骨折断端向椎管内移位或塌陷。观察铰链侧骨折愈合情况并比较不同类型骨折愈合率的差异。结果随访6-35个月,平均16个月。术后1周CT扫描243个节段,椎板铰链侧完全骨折占58.0%(141/243);其中Ⅰ型完全骨折占66.O%(93/141)、Ⅱ型25.5%(36/141)、Ⅲ型6.4%(9/141)、Ⅳ型2.1%(3/141)。术后6个月不完全骨折的愈合率97.7%,高于完全骨折愈合率89.7%,差异有统计学意义。术后3个月及6个月不同类型完全骨折愈合率的差异均有统计学意义,Ⅲ型骨折术后愈合率最低。结论椎板铰链侧完全骨折以Ⅰ型骨折为主,完全骨折的骨愈合率低,Ⅲ型骨折最差。 Objective To investigate the different bony fusion for different hinge fracture types in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty with centerpiece mini-plate fixation. Methods Forty- nine patients received the unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty from September 2009 to De- cember 2011, including 41 males and 8 females, with the average age of 61 years old (ranging from 34 to 83). The hinge fracture was divided into incomplete fracture and complete fracture according to the postop- erative CT scan. The complete fracture hinge was divided into four groups: type Ⅰ in which there was no displacement, type Ⅱ in which there was mild to moderate displacement, type Ⅲ in which there was com- plete displacement or separated, type IV in which there was hinge's collapse into cervical canal. The hinge side fracture healing would be observed in the follow-up and the difference of different types of fracture heal- ing rate would be compared. Results The follow-up time was 16 months on average, ranging from 6 to 35 months. CT scanned 243 segments a week after the operation. 58.0% (141/243) of the laminae had complete fractures on the hinge side after surgery. And type Ⅰ fracture accounted for 66.0%(93/141), type Ⅱ fracture 25.5% (36/141), type Ⅲ 64%(9/141) and type Ⅳ 2.1% (3/141). The incomplete fracture hinge has a higher bony fusion rate 6 months after the operation compared with the complete fracture hinge. Significant differ- ences were found among different complete fracture types in the healing rate 3 months after the operation and 6 months after the operation respectively. Type Ⅲ fracture has the lowest bony fusion rate. Conclusion Type Ⅰ fracture was the major type for complete fractured hinge. The hinges with complete fracture get a relativelv bad bony fusion and tvne m fracture has the lowest bonv fusion rate.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期601-606,共6页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
关键词 颈椎 椎管狭窄 骨折愈合 Cervical vertebrae Spinal stenosis Fracture, healing
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Rhee JM, Basra S. Posterior surgery for cervical rnyelopathy:laminectotny, laminectomy with fusion, and laminoplasty. Asian Spine J, 2008, 2(2): 114-126.
  • 2Komagata M, Inahata Y, Nishiyama M, et al. Treatment of myelopathy due to cervicothoracic OPLL via open door laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007, 20(5): 342-346.
  • 3Itoh T, Tsuji H. Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1985, 10(8): 729-736.
  • 4Lee DH, Hwang C J, Lee CS, et al. Hinge reclosure phenomenon after classic Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty. Spine J, 2010, 10(9): S81-82.
  • 5Liu G, Buchowski JM, Bunmaprasert T, et al. Revision surgery following cervical laminoplasty: etiology and treatment strategies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(25): 2760-2768.
  • 6Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 1: Clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(6): 647-653.
  • 7陈广东,杨惠林,王根林,干旻峰,陈俊峰.微型钛板在颈椎单开门椎管扩大椎板成形术中的应用[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2010,20(10):850-854. 被引量:76
  • 8Rhee JM, Register B, Hamasaki T, et al. Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 36(1): 9-14.
  • 9陈华,刘浩,林书,邹黎,宋跃明,李涛,曾建成,刘立岷,孔清泉,龚全.Centerpiece钢板应用于颈椎后路单开门椎板成形术的临床效果观察[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2012,9(6):12-15. 被引量:11
  • 10Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for evaluationof cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26(17): 1890-1894.

二级参考文献53

共引文献134

同被引文献65

  • 1曾岩,党耕町,马庆军.颈椎前路融合术后颈部运动功能的评价[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(24):1481-1484. 被引量:96
  • 2Wei-bing X, Wun-Jer S, Gang L, et al. Reconstructive techniques study after anterior decompression of multilevel cervical spondy- lotic myelopathy [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2009, 22(7): 511-515.
  • 3Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, et al. Anterior cervical de- compression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degenera- tion: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year mag- netic resonance inmging follow- up study [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(1): 36-43.
  • 4Houten JK, Cooper PR. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plat- ing for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossifica- tion of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome [J ]. Neurosurgery, 2003,52(5): 1081-1087.
  • 5Aronson N, Filtzer DL, Bagan M. Anterior cervical fusion by the smith-robinson approach[J]. J Neurosurg, 1968, 29(4): 396-404.
  • 6Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, et al. Long-term outcome of lami- noplasty for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation: a compar- ative study of laminoplasty and anterior spinal fusion [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30(7): 756-759.
  • 7Robinson RA, Smith GW. Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome Jl. Bull Johns Hop- kins Hosp, 1955, 96(3):223-224.
  • 8Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, et al. Cobb method or Har- rison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervi-cal radiographic analysis [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25 (16): 2072-2078.
  • 9Coffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up af- ter interbody fusion of the cervical spine [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004, 17(2): 79-85.
  • 10Shinomiya K, Okamoto A, Kamikozuru M, et al. An analysis of failures in primary cervical anterior spinal cord decompression and fusion[J]. J Spinal Disord, 1993, 6(4): 277-288.

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部