摘要
在我国,对于行政裁量司法审查的研究主要关注审查强度与审查标准,而忽视了裁量的可审查性这一前置问题。而在司法审查最为活跃的美国,该问题一直处于争鸣之中,与我国形成鲜明反差。通过梳理美国行政裁量可审查性的变迁历史,以及相应的学术争议,可以发现:扩大裁量的司法审查范围并非应然趋势,裁量能否接受司法审查取决于立法、行政和司法三方的互动。
In our country, the research on judicial review of administrative discretion mainly focuses on the strength of examination and the standard of examination, while neglecting the issue of discretion reviewability. In the United States, where judicial review is most active, the issue has always been in dispute with China in stark contrast. By combing the vicissitudes of the reviewability of administrative discretion in the United States and the corresponding academic disputes, we can find that the expanding of the scope of judicial review of discretion is not an unavoidable trend. The judicial reviewability of discretion depends on the interaction among legislation, administration and judicature.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期136-144,共9页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
行政裁量
司法审查
可审查性
审查范围
Administrative Discretion
Judicial Review
Reviewability
Review Scope
