摘要
与刑事、民事诉讼指导性案例不同的是,行政诉讼指导性案例不仅起到统一司法机关法律适用的作用,其确立的某些裁判规则的效力和功能还会扩展至行政行为领域。通过实证研究发现,行政诉讼指导性案例确立的裁判规则还发挥了统一司法审查标准与行政裁量标准的功能。当前我国行政诉讼指导性案例更倾向于对法律规定的解释,而不是对法律漏洞的填补。在具体内容上,不仅对《行政诉讼法》的规定进行了解释,还对行政裁量基准作出了例示。要发挥指导性案例在行政诉讼中的指导作用,不仅应当明确其弱于制定法与司法解释的拘束力,还要对法院援引指导性案例进行规范。
Different from the guidance cases of criminal and civil lawsuits, the guiding cases for administrative litigation not only play the role of unifying the legal application of judicial organs, but also extend its validity and function of some established rules of adjudication to administrative acts. Through empirical research, it is found that the rules of adjudication established in the guiding cases for administrative litigation have also played the function of unifying standards of judicial review and standards of administrative discretion. At present, the administrative guiding cases for administrative litigation in our country are more inclined to explain the legal provisions instead of filling the loopholes in laws. To play the guiding role of guiding cases in administrative litigation, it should be made clear that the binding force of guiding caseis weaker than statute laws and judicial interpretations, and the courts＇ reference of guiding cases should also be normalized.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期108-117,共10页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金
国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心研究成果(教技函2013[26])
关键词
指导性案例
行政诉讼
拘束力
Guiding Cases
Administrative Litigation
Binding Force
