摘要
《法律适用法》明确了当事人合意选择外国法时的查明责任,但实践中当事人由于未能提供外国法或提供的外国法资料不符合外国法实质、形式认定要求,而往往被法院认定为无法查明外国法。这一问题形成的原因在于当事人客观上无法查明和主观上不愿查明、法院"无法查明"滥用下可能故意提高外国法认定门槛以及外国法性质之争下外国法审查标准的缺失。我国可以通过完善外国法查明途径、约束法官认定"无法查明"权力的同时要求当事人引入法律论证证明外国法、制定专门外国法审查标准等途径予以解决。
The Law of Application of Law clarified the responsibility of the parties when they agree tochoose foreign law, and it is urgent to study the problem that the parties can not ascertain foreign law. Byusing empirical research methods, we can find that the parties were usually cognizanced by the court that theforeign law cannot be ascertained in practice, because the parties fail to provide foreign law, or the providedforeign law information does not conform to the substantive or formal requirements of foreign law. There arethree reasons for this problem. firstly, the parties cannot ascertain objectively and the parties are reluctant toascertain, secondly, the court may deliberately raise the cognizance threshold under“the failure of ascertainingforeign law” abusing, thirdly, the absence of the review standards of foreign law under the dispute of the natureof foreign law.To solve this problem, our country can improve and perfect the ways of ascertaining foreign law,then constraint judges’ power in cognizancing the failure of ascertaining foreign law and request the partiesintroduce legal argument to proof foreign law at the same time. At last, we should formulate specialized foreignlaw review standards.
出处
《绥化学院学报》
2017年第12期23-28,共6页
Journal of Suihua University
关键词
事人
无法查明
外国法
当事人无法查明
the parties
the failure of ascertaining foreign law
foreign law
the parties can not ascertainforeign law
